Bundesgerichtshof: STREETBALL |
Tags: Bundesgerichtshof, distinctiveness, relevant consumer, relevant time |
Posted By: Birgit Clark |
Posted on 02/04/2009 @ 13.42 |
|
Poland: professional term cannot be registered as trade mark |
Tags: distinctiveness, Poland, Polish Patent Office, Polish Supreme Administrative Court, Polish trade marks |
Posted By: Tomasz Rychlicki |
Posted on 19/03/2009 @ 14.18 |
|
Can THE JOURNAL ever be distinctive for a journal? |
Tags: regional distinctiveness, UK |
Posted By: Blog Administrator |
Posted on 13/03/2009 @ 13.01 |
|
Shells all too common in the bakery and confectionery sector |
Tags: acquired distinctiveness, distinctiveness |
Posted By: Blog Administrator |
Posted on 10/03/2009 @ 17.09 |
|
Validity of publication title trade marks in France: a discrimination in the FEMME and GAY cases? |
Tags: cour de cassation, distinctiveness, France |
Posted By: Frédéric Glaize |
Posted on 05/03/2009 @ 00.44 |
|
Poland: 10, 50, 102, 302 and counting... |
Tags: distinctiveness, Poland, Polish Patent Office, Polish trade marks |
Posted By: Tomasz Rychlicki |
Posted on 25/02/2009 @ 11.05 |
|
Finland: European Criteria |
Tags: distinctiveness, finland, slogans |
Posted By: Mikael Kolehmainen |
Posted on 06/02/2009 @ 07.04 |
|
RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion |
Tags: acquired distinctiveness, CTM, evidence |
Posted By: Blog Administrator |
Posted on 20/11/2008 @ 09.23 |
|
Adobe loses FLEX appeal |
Tags: community trade mark, descriptiveness, distinctiveness, Registrability |
Posted By: Blog Administrator |
Posted on 09/11/2008 @ 09.44 |
|
Manpower: distinctive or descriptive? |
Tags: CFI, distinctiveness |
Posted By: Blog Administrator |
Posted on 27/10/2008 @ 10.33 |
|