Poland: is Hansa history? |
Tags: Poland, Polish Patent Office, Polish trade marks |
Posted By: Tomasz Rychlicki |
Posted on 07/01/2009 @ 15.32 |
|
Austrian Patent Office: 'amended product range' for serv.ip |
Tags: Austrian Patent Office, Austrian Trade Marks, official fees, search tool |
Posted By: Birgit Clark |
Posted on 05/01/2009 @ 12.05 |
|
Poland: confusion around ARENDA |
Tags: likelihood of confusion, Poland, Polish Patent Office, Polish trade marks |
Posted By: Tomasz Rychlicki |
Posted on 05/01/2009 @ 09.34 |
|
Poland: inspiration or plagiarism? |
Tags: plagiarius, Polish trade marks |
Posted By: Tomasz Rychlicki |
Posted on 03/01/2009 @ 18.44 |
|
What happens to popular words like "focus" ... |
Tags: community trade mark |
Posted By: Blog Administrator |
Posted on 31/12/2008 @ 05.53 |
|
RAW: not enough Intel-DNA for G-Star? |
Tags: Benelux case law, Community trade mark courts, community trade mark infringement, G-Star, Intel, PepsiCo, Raw |
Posted By: Gino Van Roeyen |
Posted on 31/12/2008 @ 00.22 |
|
Conviction in Danish ‘Winnie the Pooh’ case |
Tags: Denmark, trade mark infringement |
Posted By: Blog Administrator |
Posted on 24/12/2008 @ 08.31 |
|
The ineffaceableness of a trade mark |
Tags: Fortis, removal of trade mark, trade mark infringement |
Posted By: Gino Van Roeyen |
Posted on 24/12/2008 @ 06.55 |
|
UK: Latest issue of IPInsight |
Tags: ipinsight, UKIPO; UK trade marks |
Posted By: Birgit Clark |
Posted on 23/12/2008 @ 14.34 |
|
Poland: sweet are lips and kids |
Tags: Poland, Polish Patent Office, Polish trade marks, similarity of goods, similarity of marks, threshold for similarity |
Posted By: Tomasz Rychlicki |
Posted on 20/12/2008 @ 11.10 |
|