Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
Who we all are...
SATURDAY, 10 JANUARY 2009
Polish Pickenpack's problems
On 27 September 1996, the Polish entrepreneur Katarzyna Warzocha from Koniecpol applied to the Polish Patent Office to register the word trade mark PICKENPACK in classes 29 and 30 for goods such as frozen meat products, fish, poultry and game, frozen fruits and vegetables and frozen flour products. On 9 February 2000, the PPO granted the right (R-118206).
Posted by: Tomasz Rychlicki @ 13.47
Poland, Polish Patent Office, Polish trade marks, trade mark use,
German company Pickenpack-Hussmann & Hahn Seafood GmbH from Lüneburg owned an international registration for the word-figurative trade mark PICKEN PACK (IR-520553) in class 29 for goods such as meat, fish, poultry and game as well as cooked fruit and vegetables, cooked take-away dishes mainly consisting of meat, fish, potatoes and/or other vegetables; all these goods are deep frozen. The registration was granted in the Republic of Poland on October 2008. German company filed before the Polish Patent Office a motion to declare the lapse of trade mark protection based on provision of article 169(1)(i):
1. The right of protection for a trademark shall also lapse:
(i) on failure to put to genuine use of the registered trade mark for the goods covered by the registration for a period of five successive years after a decision on the grant of a right of protection has been taken, unless serious reasons for its non-use exist,
Katarzyna Warzocha argued that she started to use the contested trade mark in the previous two years during talks with contractors interested in her offer. She provided information that the PICKENPACK trade mark had been used for frozen products, advertising flyers, business cards and offers of cooperation. Katarzyna Warzocha claimed that the goods labelled with this trade mark were present at the Polagra fair in the years 2001-2005. She also declared that she was able to provide statements of companies, which took supplies of frozen products poduced by her company. German company argued that this was not real evidence of actual use. On 6 November 2008, the PPO postponed the hearing in this case (act signature Sp. 27/06) to supplement the evidence.
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment
MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.
The Class 46 Archive