Issue 070
  October 2016
Contents:
 

Demystifying the rebrand

>  
 

The future of classification online

>  
 

Judges tackle 10 trade mark questions

>  
 

Latest data on economic performance of IP-rich industries

>  
 

Updates from EUIPO

>  
 

The new Swiss “geographical mark”

>  
 

The Mexican trade mark “opposition”

>  
 

New edition of Nice Classification

>  
 

WIPO seminars in November

>  
 

The pluses and minuses of licensing brands

>  
 

Mark your calendars!

>  
 

MARQUES Media Roundup

>  
 
Disclaimer:
The views expressed by contributors to this newsletter are their own and do not necessarily reflect the policy and/or opinions of MARQUES and/or its membership.  Information is published only as a guide and not as a comprehensive authority on any of the subjects covered.  While every effort has been made to ensure the information given is accurate and not misleading neither MARQUES nor the contributors can accept any responsibility for any loss or liability perceived to have arisen from the use or application of any such information or for errors and omissions.  Readers are strongly advised to follow up articles of interest with quoted sources and specialist advisors.
 

9 Cartwright Court Cartwright Way
Bardon
Leicester
LE67 1UE
United Kingdom
T: +44 116 274 7355
F: +44 116 274 7365
E: info@marques.org
Demystifying the rebrand

 

 

In-house counsel from Mars and Google helped attendees at the MARQUES Annual Conference understand some of the mysteries and issues around rebranding

Read More >>
The future of classification online


During last month’s Annual Conference, MARQUES delegates were able to attend a workshop organised by the European Trade Mark Law & Practice team and the EUIPO and hosted at EUIPO’s headquarters in Alicante. The EUIPO gave a preview of planned new online tools as well as a recap of those that are already available for all users of the EU trade mark system

Read More >>
Judges tackle 10 trade mark questions

17th October saw another successful run (the fifth) of the popular annual “Question the Trade Mark Judges”. Hosted by University College London, it is organised jointly by MARQUES and UCL’s Institute of Brand and Innovation Law (IBIL)

Read More >>

Latest data on economic performance of IP-rich industries

 

Updates from EUIPO


28% of all jobs in the EU can be directly attributed to IPR-intensive industries, as can 42% of total economic activity in the EU, according to a new study published this month

 

There are a number of recent developments at EUIPO that will be of interest to MARQUES members

Read More >>   Read More >>
The new Swiss “geographical mark”

 

 

 

Jürg Simon of the MARQUES GI Team discusses the benefits of the new Swiss geographical mark


The economic value of origin

The geographical origin of a product or service may enjoy an excellent reputation for quality, reliability or even environmentally high standards. The indication of a specific geographical origin therefore may represent an economic value and an important competitive advantage.

The so-called Swissness legislation

Based on a history of increasing abuses of the “Swiss made” indication and of reputed non-Swiss indications of origin on the Swiss market, the Swiss legislator, after lengthy and complicated deliberations, enacted a new legislation on the protection of Swiss and non-Swiss indications of origin, entering into force in 2017.

So, importantly, although this new legislation is called “Swissness” legislation, it also concerns non-Swiss geographical indications of origin. As in most countries, legislation and jurisprudence was rather general and flawed in Switzerland so far, based on general principles (“thou shall not lie”) and applied on a case-by-case basis, trying to assess consumer deception ex post, that is after products or services have already been marketed.

The new legislation, though, brings a change of paradigm: it is basically an ex ante approach, defining specific criteria with specific percentages of added value in order to legally use a geographical indication. As new criteria, the geographical origin is mainly determined according to the location where the essential manufacturing step took place. Additionally, for foodstuffs, as a guiding principle, 80% of the weight of the raw material composing the foodstuff must originate in the geographical place which is used as an indication of origin for that product. For industrial products, the geographical origin is determined by the place of the essential manufacturing step and the place where at least 60% of the production costs, including research and development costs, occur.

The geographical origin of natural products is determined by the place of extraction, harvest, or growth of the products. Similar new rules apply for services. The Swiss legislator also created a new national register for geographical indications for all goods (not only for agricultural products as is actually the case) whose reputation or quality is essentially attributable to their respective geographical origin.

The new geographical mark

This new legislation also “invented” the so-called geographical mark, an instrument that could be of interest especially for non-Swiss operators. By way of derogation from the crucial absolute ground of refusal of descriptiveness, a geographical mark may now be registered in Switzerland for (a) a designation of origin or a geographical indication already registered as a DOP (including non-Swiss DOPs), (b) a registered designation of origin for wine or a foreign wine designation which meets the requirements of the Swiss wine legislation, or (c) an indication of origin that is the subject matter of a governmental regulation (such as Swiss made for watches) or a foreign indication of source that is based on an equivalent foreign regulation.

The registration of a geographical mark may be requested by the group which registered the DOP, the foreign authority responsible for the regulation of wine designations as well as the group that obtained the protection of such a foreign wine designation or the umbrella organisation of an economic sector for which the Swiss government has enacted a specific ordinance or which acts on the basis of on an equivalent foreign regulation. The applicant for a geographical mark must file regulations governing the use of the mark. These regulations must correspond to the product specification (that is, the DOP specification) or the pre-existing applicable provisions; they may not provide for remuneration in exchange for use of the geographical mark.

As to the rights conferred by such a geographical mark it is important to note that it may be used by any person provided that the requirements of the regulations are fulfilled. The proprietor of such a geographical mark may prohibit others from using the mark in the course of trade for identical or similar goods where such use contravenes the regulations. Transfer or licensing of a geographical mark are not permitted. Furthermore, a geographical mark is no basis for an opposition against latter marks; on the other hand, the registration of a geographical mark cannot be opposed on the basis of prior trade marks. The provisions governing the use of the trade mark and consequences of non-use do not apply.

This geographical mark has been created to facilitate enforcing protection of the respective designations in Switzerland and abroad. The legislator’s plan of action is to open the route of trade mark enforcement for these designations by transforming them into formal trade mark rights.

Importantly, this route is opened not only for Swiss designations but also for foreign designations. We assume that this new instrument could be interesting especially for the wine sector. Whether the plan of action is going to work will be seen in the years to come.

 


 

Jürg Simon is a Partner of Lenz & Staehelin in Zurich and a member of the MARQUES GI Team

 

 

The Mexican trade mark “opposition”

 

There are many concerns about the new Mexican trade mark opposition system, as Laura Collada of the MARQUES International Trade Mark Law and Practice Team explains

Read More >>

New edition of Nice Classification

 

WIPO seminars in November


The 11th edition of the Nice Classification will enter into force on 1st January 2017

 


There are seminars on The Hague Agreement and Madrid System planned in Geneva during November

Read More >>   Read More >>
The pluses and minuses of licensing brands

In the first of a series of articles looking at various aspects of licensing brands, members of the MARQUES IAM Team discuss the advantages of exploiting your brand through licensing arrangements

Read More >>

Mark your calendars!

 

MARQUES Media Roundup

Start planning for the 2017 and 2018 Annual Conferences, and other MARQUES events

 

 


Keep up to date with trade mark and other IP developments on the MARQUES blogs and social media

Read More >>   Read More >>

Unsubscribe:
You can unsubscribe from this emailing list or change the frequency and type of information you receive from MARQUES at anytime by logging into the MARQUES website and clicking on the Preferences tab in the My Profile section of the My Account page.  Alternatively you can reply to this email with the subject 'NewsChannel - Unsubscribe' to be removed from this mailing list.