Log in

CLASS 99


The blog for design law, in Europe and worldwide. This weblog is written by a team of design experts and fans. To contribute, or join us, or for any other reason, email class99@marques.org.

Want to receive Class 99 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Blog Administrator
David Musker
Henning Hartwig
Hidde Koenraad
Krystian Maciaszek
Peter Gustav Olson
MONDAY, 6 JANUARY 2020
France’s latest attempt to introduce a repair clause aborted at advanced stage

Frédéric Glaize of the MARQUES Designs Team provides an update on the latest controversy regarding the repair clause for certain car parts in France.

A law on “orientation of mobility” (dubbed “LOM” for Loi d’Orientation des Mobilités”), which was adopted by the French parliament in November 2019, contained an article introducing the notion of repair clause for certain car parts in the French IP Code. This clause appeared in article 110 of the LOM law – a totally involuntary echo to the numbering of Regulation 6/2002.

This repair clause provided an exception to the rights attached to a French design registration, in relation to “acts intended to restore their initial appearance to a motor vehicle or a trailer […] and which: (A) relate to parts relating to the glazing, optics and mirrors, (B) or are made by the supplier who manufactured the original part.”

For designs relating to parts of a motor vehicle or a trailer which would not fall under one of the aforementioned A or B categories, article 110 reduced the validity of their registrations from 25 years to 10 years.

In a decision issued on December 20, 2019, the French Constitutional Council (Conseil Constitutionnel) blocked article 110 (and some other unrelated provisions) of the LOM law. During the parliamentary debates, the repair clause had been introduced through a legislative amendment. The Council deemed that this amendment was a rider (un “cavalier législatif”), i.e. it was not related to any other part of the law it was introduced in.

For this reason article 110 is one of the articles considered to have been adopted in an unconstitutional manner and therefore is unconstitutional.

Article 110 of the LOM law was the latest and most advanced of many attempts to introduce a repair clause in French design law. The possibility of introducing a repair clause was raised and each time rejected during discussions on various projects or legislative proposals in 2008, in 2011, and twice in 2014.

Frédéric Glaize is a French and European trade mark and design attorney with Plasseraud in Paris and a member of the MARQUES Designs Team

Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 08.41
Tags: repair clause, LOM, Regulation 6/2002, ,
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class99?XID=BHA884

MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 99 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
POST ADDRESS

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox