Log in

CLASS 99


The blog for design law, in Europe and worldwide. This weblog is written by a team of design experts and fans. To contribute, or join us, or for any other reason, email class99@marques.org.

Want to receive Class 99 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Blog Administrator
David Musker
Henning Hartwig
Hidde Koenraad
Krystian Maciaszek
Peter Gustav Olson
MONDAY, 29 JULY 2013
From 'graphic symbols' to 'virtual designs'
Jason Du Mont has just informed us of an article which he recently wrote together with Mark Janis.  This article, says Jason, deals with the product/design question which Jani posed yesterday, but in the context of virtual designs (GUIs, icons, moving/static, etc). Adds Jason: "As you can imagine, virtual designs have to get over similar doctrinal hurdles. While it's US focused, it also provides the first empirical look at design protection in this sector".

The title of the article is "Virtual Designs" and it will be published in the Stanford Technology Law Review later this year.  It's not short, weighing in at 70 pages, but don't let that put you off!  You can access it in full via SSRN here. According to the abstract:
"Industrial design is migrating to the virtual world, and the design patent system is migrating with it. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has already granted several thousand design patents on virtual designs, patents that cover the designs of graphical user interfaces for smartphones, tablets, and other products, as well as the designs of icons or other artifacts of various virtual environments. Many more such design patent applications are pending; in fact, over the past year, more U.S. design patent applications have been filed for virtual designs than for nearly any other type of design subject matter.

Our project is the first comprehensive analysis of design patent protection for virtual designs. We first take up the question of virtual designs as design patent-eligible subject matter, a question that has not yet been tested in the courts. We show that longstanding principles of design patent jurisprudence supply an answer to the question, with surprisingly little need for adaptation. We then present the results of an empirical study analyzing all issued U.S. design patents on virtual designs and their prosecution histories. Here we show how utility patent metrics for quality and value can be extended to design patents. Using these metrics, we show that design patents on virtual designs fare at least as well in quality and value as do design patents on other types of designs. In fact, design patents on virtual designs fare better in some respects. And, finally, we conclude by identifying issues that are likely to arise in anticipated future litigation over patents on virtual designs".
Thanks, Jason, for letting us know!
Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 11.35
Tags: virtual designs,
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class99?XID=BHA463

MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 99 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
POST ADDRESS

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox