CLASS 99
The blog for design law, in Europe and worldwide. This weblog is written by a team of design experts and fans. To contribute, or join us, or for any other reason, email class99@marques.org.
Want to receive Class 99 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.
Click here subscribe for free.
Who we all are...
FRIDAY, 19 JUNE 2009
Reform of UK design litigation
The very wonderful Ipkat has a link to the User Group proposals to reform the Patents County Court, for lower costs and higher speed.
The PCC was set up for precisely this, but an unintended consequence of the Woolf Reforms was to turn it into a High Court clone, with little scope for cheaper procedures better suited to SMEs or litigants in person.
Since the appointment of Judge Fysh, author of the 5th Edition of Russell Clarke on designs and one of our great design jurists, there has been a policy of routing design cases to the PCC, and when Section 27A of the Registered Designs Act comes in, he will also get all appeals from the Registry (which currently go to the Registered Designs Appeal Tribunal). We will then have a unified design court for England and Wales under Judge Fysh.
Sounds great - except that, as CIPA said back in 2005 when the idea was floated, the costs regime would go from nominal costs on a scale as in the Intellectual Property Office and on Trade Mark appeals to the Appointed Person, to the much higher spending, higher risk High Court system of costs, vastly increasing the downside risk of litigation.
Well, I am delighted to say that the proposals involve going to the scale fee system, not just for design appeals as CIPA suggested but for everything. I think that will really make a difference - UK justice will become affordable to SMEs again.
If you agree, please send your comments to:
Philip Westmacott,
Bristows
100 Victoria Embankment
London EC4Y 0DH
or by email to:
philip.westmacott@bristows.com Posted by: David Musker @ 17.25
Tags: costs, litigation,
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class99?XID=BHA18
Reform of UK design litigation
The very wonderful Ipkat has a link to the User Group proposals to reform the Patents County Court, for lower costs and higher speed.
The PCC was set up for precisely this, but an unintended consequence of the Woolf Reforms was to turn it into a High Court clone, with little scope for cheaper procedures better suited to SMEs or litigants in person.
Since the appointment of Judge Fysh, author of the 5th Edition of Russell Clarke on designs and one of our great design jurists, there has been a policy of routing design cases to the PCC, and when Section 27A of the Registered Designs Act comes in, he will also get all appeals from the Registry (which currently go to the Registered Designs Appeal Tribunal). We will then have a unified design court for England and Wales under Judge Fysh.
Sounds great - except that, as CIPA said back in 2005 when the idea was floated, the costs regime would go from nominal costs on a scale as in the Intellectual Property Office and on Trade Mark appeals to the Appointed Person, to the much higher spending, higher risk High Court system of costs, vastly increasing the downside risk of litigation.
Well, I am delighted to say that the proposals involve going to the scale fee system, not just for design appeals as CIPA suggested but for everything. I think that will really make a difference - UK justice will become affordable to SMEs again.
If you agree, please send your comments to:
Philip Westmacott,
Bristows
100 Victoria Embankment
London EC4Y 0DH
or by email to:
philip.westmacott@bristows.com Posted by: David Musker @ 17.25
Tags: costs, litigation,
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class99?XID=BHA18
MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.
The Class 99 Archive
