Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
TUESDAY, 19 MARCH 2013
Article 102(1) and avoiding Community trade mark injunctions: can you help?
Uli Hildebrandt and Andreas Lubberger, of MARQUES member law firm Lubberger Lehment, are working on a commentary on the Community Trade Mark Regulation.  Uli has a problem with Art. 102(1), which reads

Where a Community trade mark court finds that the defendant has infringed or threatened to infringe a Community trade mark, it shall, unless there are special reasons for not doing so, issue an order prohibiting the defendant from proceeding with the acts which infringed or would infringe the Community trade mark.

The Court of Justice of the European Union has taught us in Nokia Corporation v Wärdell Case C-316/05, [2007] E.T.M.R. 20, [2007] ECR I-12083  that "special reasons" are the same in the whole Community, and that a court is bound to prohibit the use of the trade mark unless there are "special reasons". But what about infringers that want to avoid a court proceeding? Uli explains: 

"There are different ways to avoid court proceeding throughout the Community. As far as I know, in the UK you simply have to undertake that you will refrain from further infringements. In Germany you have to promise a contractual penalty for future infringements. And in Austria you have to run to a notary public. And that's the background for my questions:

* What steps can an infringer take in your member state to avoid a court proceeding? Which are the relevant court decisions (with case number and date) ruling out this method?

* Does this method work in your member state in practice? Or are there a lot of repeated infringements?

* What makes the method in your member state effective? Can you recommend your state's method?

Adds Uli: I could not find a book answering these questions. Most international trade mark litigation books start with the court proceeding and do not teach us about the time before. 

Readers can post their answers to the MARQUES Linked In Group or email them to Uli directly at hildebrandt@lubbergerlehment.com. Uli will then assess the answers and provide a condensed feedback.
Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 01.43
Tags: CTM, injunctions,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA3156
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
POST ADDRESS

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox