Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
FRIDAY, 16 MARCH 2012
German Federal Patent Court: DDR-Ampelmännchen

In a decision of September 2011 (case reference: 28 W (pat) 29/11) the German Federal Patent Court had to decide in appeal proceedings against a partial invalidity decision relating to a trade mark registration for the “DDR-Ampelmännchen” (see left), the little green man used in the former GDR's in pedestrian traffic lights.  The German national mark was, inter alia, registered for "goods made of metal insofar as included in class 6, in particular metal signs and metal postcards".   The German Patent and Trademark office (DPMA) had partially invalidated the mark for the aforementioned class 6 goods.

 

By way of legal background:  § 50 (1),( 2) in combination with § 8 (2) No. 1 German Trade Mark Act provide that a registered trade mark can only be cancelled in cases where the mark lacked the necessary distinctiveness under § 8 (2) No. 1 German Trade Mark Act at the time of registration and this absolute ground of refusal still exists at the time of deciding the cancellation application.

On appeal, Federal Patent Court disagreed with this assessment and took the view that consumers would regard the “DDR-Ampelmännchen” in cases where it used as a metal sign or a visual motif on a postcard, at least also as an indicator of trade origin for these goods, that is metal signs and postcards depicting the little green man.  Further, there was no indication that consumers would exclusively regard the little green man as prevailingly descriptive when shown on printed matter in the wider sense, neither was it non-distinctive for the goods in question.  The court also explained that this version of the little green man had lost its legal meaning after the German reunification.  Even though the DDR-Ampelmännchen could still be found in use in some traffic lights in Berlin, it had lost its former legal significance as a traffic sign. The court therefore overturned the DPMA's decision and refused the application for partial invalidity since the sign was "not not protectable" as a trade mark ("nicht schutzunfähig").

Case reference: 28 W (pat) 29/11).  The decision can be retrieved here (in German)

Posted by: Birgit Clark @ 07.29
Tags: German trade mark law,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA2756
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
POST ADDRESS

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox