Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
MONDAY, 20 JUNE 2011
Germany: iNanny not registerable as a word sign

Once more the Federal German Patent Court (Bundespatentgericht) refused the registration of a word sign which was registered by OHIM apparently without any problems.

The sign in question is:

iNanny

which was filed for goods in class 9 as well as various services in classes 38 and 45, all of which referring to a system for tracking people with GPS signals and providing the respective information on the internet.

The German Patent and Trademark Office stated in the first instance that the sign is composed of the letter "i", allegedly being commonly used as an abbreviation for "internet" or "information", and the English term "Nanny", which is understood and well known by German consumers in the sense of someone taking care of children ("Kindermädchen"). Thus it is obvious that the claimed goods and services are suited to provide "nanny"-services, i.e. tracking and watching of children via the internet. Therefore the sign is descriptive and lacks distinctiveness.

Although the applicant tried to argue that consumers will not necessarily understand the letter "i" as a reference to the internet, the court upheld the argumentation of the German Patent and Trademark Office and confirmed the rejection.

By the way, the corresponding trade mark with design, i.e.

was deemed to be registerable without any problems...

Case reference: Bundespatentgericht 26 W (pat) 23/10 "iNanny" of May 31, 2011. The decision can be retrieved from the court’s website by following the above link.


PS: This Class 46 member thinks that this decision is once more a good example for the fact that it may be easier to register a possibly descriptive trade mark (even an English one) with OHIM than with the German authorities...

Posted by: Robert Börner @ 10.43
Tags: Germany, distinctiveness, word sign,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA2424
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
POST ADDRESS

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox