Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
WEDNESDAY, 20 JANUARY 2016
Nestlé loses KitKat appeal, but there may be more to come

Here's some hot-off-the-press news from the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales -- it's the keenly-awaited ruling of top intellectual property judge Mr Justice Arnold in Société ses Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd [2016] EWHC 50 (Ch), the controversial case concerning registrability as a trade mark of the four-finger three-dimensional shape of the Kit Kat chocolate biscuit confection.  

To recap, the UK Trade Mark Registry concluded that the mark was unregistrable, raising issues relating to both the distinctiveness of the shape and to its capacity to be perceived as a trade mark.  On appeal Mr Justice Arnold agreed, but referred a number of questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for a preliminary ruling. The CJEU's decision, which came in for a degree of criticism both for its lack of clarity and for failing to answer the questions in the form in which they were posed, is summarised here.

Today Mr Justice Arnold both dismissed Nestlé's appeal in relation to non-registration of the mark for various goods in Class 30 and allowed Cadbury's appeal against the registration of the same mark for cakes and pastries.

This case will run and run.  Although the judge admitted that it was tempting to make a further reference to the CJEU, he resisted the temptation on the ground that it was unlikely to yield any further result. The dispute will certainly be heard next by the Court of Appeal and, if the losing party before that court has anything to say about it, it will then be the subject of an application for appeal to the Supreme Court. Each of those courts may opt to make a further reference to the CJEU before a final result is reached.

Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 15.16
Tags: KitKat, 3D shape, distinctiveness, registrability,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA4277
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
POST ADDRESS

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox