Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
TUESDAY, 28 JANUARY 2014
Carnival: product appearance as a trade mark

The Supreme Administrative Court of Finland published in May 2013 a decision regarding a registration of a biscuit as a trade mark. This was a special occasion in Finland, it being the first time that the Supreme Administrative Court of Finland has published a precedental decision on the appearance of a product as a trade mark.

Originally the National Board of Patents and Registrations and the Board of Appeal both refused the trade mark application, rejecting the argument that the mark’s distinctiveness was both inherent and acquired. They held that the shape was not sufficiently different from other biscuit shapes that existed in the market for the mark to be recognized as an indication of origin.  Distinctiveness was also rejected since evidence on acquired distinctiveness was submitted a year after the application date.

There were two main issues in this case. The first was naturally the assessment of whether the shape of the well-known Carnival biscuit could be registered as a trade mark.  The Supreme Administrative Court of Finland allowed registration of the mark as it had acquired distinctiveness through longstanding and extensive use. Carnival biscuits have been in the Finnish market since 1925, bearing the same name and also having the same shape and appearance as the applicant’s trade mark.  In the application the graphic representation of the product depicted a square with wavy edges and a film-like surface.

The second main issue in the case was the extensive evidence that the applicant had provided in order to prove acquired distinctiveness as well as the market survey that was interestingly provided a year after the application had been filed. The Supreme Administrative Court of Finland held that the market survey was admissible, basing its decision on the fact that the period after the application date of the trade mark had not deprived the submitted data of its evidential value and that the level of awareness that the market survey shows was not caused by any marketing efforts conducted that year. Also there were no major changes in the Finnish biscuit market that could have changed the Court’s conclusion in the matter.

The survey proved that 72 percent of respondents recognized the biscuit, based on its appearance. Also, 72 percent of the respondents linked the shape with the name of the product in question as “Carnival”.

 Class 46 thanks Tiina Komppa (Rochier) for providing us with this note.

Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 18.37
Tags: Finland, registrability, product shape,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA3574
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
POST ADDRESS

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox