Log in

CLASS 99


The blog for design law, in Europe and worldwide. This weblog is written by a team of design experts and fans. To contribute, or join us, or for any other reason, email class99@marques.org.

Want to receive Class 99 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Blog Administrator
David Musker
Henning Hartwig
Hidde Koenraad
Krystian Maciaszek
Peter Gustav Olson
MONDAY, 19 OCTOBER 2015
Danish court rules compatibility illustration infringes design right

A recent note on International Law Office by Mads Marstrand-Jørgensen (Njord Law Firm) explains the ruling in a Danish design case, Sangenic International Limited v Lamico ApS (A-11-15, September 10 2015).

In this action the Maritime and Commercial Court -- which hears a considerable number of civil suits for intellectual property infringement annually -- had to consider whether the reproduction of a registered design infringed the design right. Sangenic was the registered proprietor of a registered Community design for a waste bin for nappies, for which Lamico manufactured refill bags which could be accommodated both by Sangenic's waste bin and the bins of others. To illustrate that Lamico's refill bags would fit Sangenic's bins, Lamico included a small drawing of Sangenic's bin on its labels.

Left: for those who don't like illustrations of waste bins for nappies ...

Sangenic objected to this, maintaining that any reproduction of its registered design would infringe its rights under the Regulation 6/2002 on Community Designs and sought interim relief. Lamico denied that it had infringed the right, maintaining that the reproduction was not only lawful but was done in good faith and in the interest of promoting competition within the market. What's more, said Lamico, Article 19 of the Regulation ("Rights conferred by the Community design") made no mention of depictions. Even if this was not so,its reproduction was covered by the limitation in Article 20(1)c), since it was a "reproduction for the purpose of making citations or of teaching", also being "compatible with fair trade practice and do not unduly prejudice the normal exploitation of the design", where "mention is made of the source".

The court found that any reproduction constitutes an infringement of the design right and issued an interim injunction. The decision is however under appeal. 

Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 15.49
Tags: Denmark, infringement, illustration for compatibility purposes,
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class99?XID=BHA695

MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 99 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
POST ADDRESS

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox