CLASS 99
The blog for design law, in Europe and worldwide. This weblog is written by a team of design experts and fans. To contribute, or join us, or for any other reason, email class99@marques.org.
Want to receive Class 99 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.
Click here subscribe for free.
Who we all are...
FRIDAY, 7 DECEMBER 2012
Analysis of the Neuman gnomes
We briefly posted a note on the recent CJEU decision in Joined Cases C 101/11 P and C 102/11 P – Neuman, Galdeano del Sel and OHIM v Baena Grupo – Neuman. You can find a much better analysis on the decision, and its significance in design/trade mark conflicts, by Class 99 stalwart Henning Hartwig on Bardehle's website here - highly recommended.
Our item on the General Court decision (the subject of the appeal), with some background, is here. Posted by: David Musker @ 12.40
Tags: appeal, cjeu, ecj, gnomes, OHIM, trade mark,
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class99?XID=BHA408
Analysis of the Neuman gnomes
We briefly posted a note on the recent CJEU decision in Joined Cases C 101/11 P and C 102/11 P – Neuman, Galdeano del Sel and OHIM v Baena Grupo – Neuman. You can find a much better analysis on the decision, and its significance in design/trade mark conflicts, by Class 99 stalwart Henning Hartwig on Bardehle's website here - highly recommended.
Our item on the General Court decision (the subject of the appeal), with some background, is here. Posted by: David Musker @ 12.40
Tags: appeal, cjeu, ecj, gnomes, OHIM, trade mark,
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class99?XID=BHA408
MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.
The Class 99 Archive
