CLASS 99
The blog for design law, in Europe and worldwide. This weblog is written by a team of design experts and fans. To contribute, or join us, or for any other reason, email class99@marques.org.
Want to receive Class 99 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.
Click here subscribe for free.
Who we all are...
MONDAY, 21 JUNE 2010
Another reader's query
Here's another question from Andrew Clay (Head of IP, Hammonds LLP). It relates to the UK's Registered Designs Act 1949, section 19(1), which states
Tags: registration, UK registered design right,
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class99?XID=BHA135
Another reader's query
"Where any person becomes entitled by assignment, transmission or operation of law to a registered design or to a share in a registered design, or becomes entitled as mortgagee, licensee or otherwise to any other interest in a registered design, he shall apply to the registrar in the prescribed manner for the registration of his title as proprietor or co-proprietor or, as the case may be, of notice of his interest, in the register of designs".Andrew asks:
"Section 19(1) RDA - what is all this about? You shall register but what happens if you don't? You can't sue for infringement (section 7) but the section 19(4) restriction on who can deal has gone. Do you lose out to a subsequent bona fide purchaser for value without notice or not, as for patents or trade marks? Why aren't the provisions clear on what is an important point, especially following umpteen revisions of the RDA? What could possibly be the policy reason for this difference in treatment?"Any thoughts, folks? Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 05.49
Tags: registration, UK registered design right,
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class99?XID=BHA135
MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.
The Class 99 Archive
