| Showing posts with tag ECJ reference. |
| Page: 1 2 3 4 |
| Bud court asks ECJ: what is "acquiesced"? |
| Tags: ECJ reference, acquiescence |
| Posted By: Blog Administrator |
| Posted on 27/11/2009 @ 12.40 |
| L'Oréal SA v eBay: so many questions to answer |
| Tags: ECJ reference |
| Posted By: Blog Administrator |
| Posted on 25/10/2009 @ 15.17 |
| Questions on acquiescence for ECJ |
| Tags: ECJ reference |
| Posted By: Blog Administrator |
| Posted on 21/10/2009 @ 22.04 |
| The AG's opinion on "AdWords/Keywords": the conclusions |
| Tags: adwords, ECJ reference for preliminary ruling |
| Posted By: Birgit Clark |
| Posted on 22/09/2009 @ 12.29 |
| AdWords: first glimpse on Advocate General's conclusions in Vuitton / Google |
| Tags: adwords, ECJ reference for preliminary ruling |
| Posted By: Frédéric Glaize |
| Posted on 22/09/2009 @ 09.39 |
| CTMs and geographical limits on relief - a question for the ECJ |
| Tags: ecj reference |
| Posted By: Blog Administrator |
| Posted on 04/09/2009 @ 13.13 |
| Google France opinion: ECJ announces revised date |
| Tags: Google France ECJ reference |
| Posted By: Blog Administrator |
| Posted on 21/07/2009 @ 09.29 |
| Coty 'perfume tester' reference: the big question |
| Tags: ECJ reference for preliminary ruling, exaustion of rights, perfume testers |
| Posted By: Blog Administrator |
| Posted on 30/06/2009 @ 11.56 |
| Greek court refers PDO questions to ECJ |
| Tags: ecj reference, Protected Designations of Origin |
| Posted By: Blog Administrator |
| Posted on 25/06/2009 @ 05.52 |
| ECJ judgment in L'Oréal/Bellure |
| Tags: ECJ reference for preliminary ruling, L'Oréal v Bellure |
| Posted By: Frédéric Glaize |
| Posted on 18/06/2009 @ 12.58 |