Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
TUESDAY, 9 FEBRUARY 2021
Latest updates on IP in China

Members of the MARQUES China Team share recent news on statistics, legislative reforms and case law from China. By Mr Xiaoming Liu and Mr Tingxi Huo.

CNIPA’s latest statistics

In 2020, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) examined that there were 8.784 million new national trade mark applications, up by 6.43% over the previous year.

The average duration of examination has been shortened to four months. The duration of registration has been shortened to between seven and eight months. Validly registered trade marks total 30.17 million and there are 6,085 registered geographical indications.

Since 2018, the CNIPA has rejected more than 150,000 trade mark applications filed in bad faith or for hoarding purpose.

Criminal Law amended

On 26 December 2020, the Chinese Congress released the 11th amendment of the Criminal Law, which will come into effect on 1 March 2021. The highlights relating to IP summarized are:

  • Under Article 213, trade mark protection has been extended from goods to services. Although the protection covers services, the amendment has further clarified the issue in the law.
  • Under Article 213, protection of copyright has been extended to cover copyright-related rights.
  • The maximum imprisonment in serious scenarios for the following five crimes has been extended from seven to 10 years:
  1. Counterfeiting registered trade marks;
  2. Selling goods bearing counterfeit registered trade marks;
  3. Illegally manufacturing or selling illegally manufactured identifications of registered trade marks;
  4. Crime of infringement on copyright; and
  5. Crime of infringement on trade secrets.
  • However, surveillance and detention, namely the freedom-limiting penalty that is lighter than imprisonment, has been abolished.

In general, the penalty has become heavier. We expect that the amendment will be more of a deterrent to the infringers and can better protect legitimate IP rights in China.

LEGO copyright case

SPC updates 18 interpretations

In 2020, the Chinese Congress made the first Civil Code and amended the Patent Law. In 2019, the Trademark Law was amended. In 2018, the Chinese Trademark Office and Chinese Patent Office merged and formed the current China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA).

The Civil Procedural Law and the Administrative Procedural Law were also amended in recent years.

Accordingly, the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) decided on 23 December 2020 to amend its 18 judicial IP interpretations to keep up with the developments.

On 29 December 2020, the Shanghai High People’s Court upheld the first-instance court’s ruling that the prime culprit infringing Lego’s copyright should be imprisoned for six years and fined CNY90 million. Another eight accessary criminals were sentenced to imprisonment ranging from three years to four years and 10 months, with fines ranging from CNY0.2 million to CNY4.5 million.

The criminals were found out to have copied Lego’s 663 copyrighted toys, with an illegal turnover of more than CNY330 million and unsold stock of CNY30 million. As Denmark and China are both members of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, China is obliged to protect Lego’s copyright.

Had the infringement happened after 1 March 2021 when the newly amended Criminal Law comes into effect, the imprisonment and fines could be heavier. However, the fine was not awarded to Lego. If it wishes, Lego is entitled to file a civil lawsuit to claim damages.

By Xiaoming Liu and Tingxi Huo, of Chofn IP, China. Find more resources about China on the China Team page

Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 10.01
Tags: CNIPA, SPC, Lego,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA4963
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
POST ADDRESS

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox