Log in


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
ISP liability throughout the EU: version 3.0

The MARQUES Cyberspace Team has published the latest update to its paper on ISP liability. Gabriele Engels introduces it.

Advocate General’s Opinion

In light of the recent opinion published by the Advocate General of the CJEU in connection with a reference for a preliminary ruling from the German Federal Supreme Court (16 July 2020, joined cases C‑682/18 and C‑683/18) concerning the primary liability of platforms such as Uploaded and YouTube, the Cyberspace Team has taken the opportunity to revise and update its paper “Overview on the jurisdiction on liability of Internet Service Providers (ISPs)”.

The considerations brought forward by Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe have again highlighted how relevant and important the discussion surrounding provider liability remains, especially with regard to the much debated Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (Directive 2019/790/EC).

In the view of the Advocate General, pursuant to the current legal situation, the illegal uploading of protected content by platform users does not result in the direct primary liability of the platform operators, as they merely act as intermediaries. Only the uploading users themselves are primarily liable.

This will, however, change with the implementation of the new Directive, which EU Member States must implement by June 2021. According to its requirements, platform operators will be obliged to obtain the permission of rights holders for the online publication of works uploaded by their users (e.g. through licensing agreements). Failure to do so can result in the primary liability of host providers.

A final decision by the CJEU is still pending and can be expected in a few months’ time.

Latest decisions

This updated version of the paper for the first time includes a comprehensive review of the French case law on provider liability, as well as a detailed and updated examination of the newest rulings of the CJEU and national courts (in Germany, the Netherlands, England, Denmark and Sweden).

We would like to take this opportunity to invite any interested MARQUES members to contact the Team with details of other countries to include.

To view the newest version of the "Overview on the jurisdiction on liability of Internet Service Providers (ISP)", please click here (MARQUES login required).

Gabriele Engels is counsel at DLA Piper in Cologne and Co-Vice-Chair of the Cyberspace Team

Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 08.25
Tags: YouTube, ISP, CJEU, Cyberspace,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA4913
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment

MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.

The Class 46 Archive








+44 (0)116 2747355

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE


Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
Robert Harrison

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox