Log in


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
DETTOL obtains favourable decision against DEVTOL in India

Manisha Singh and Omesh Puri bring news of an important decision in a lookalike case, following a hearing held by video conference by the Delhi High Court.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the significance of brands dealing with healthcare products such as medicines, soaps and hand sanitizers has increased greatly. As per WHO Guidelines, washing hands with soap and water and using alcohol-based hand rub are the recommended measures to protect against infections.

This has resulted in a huge demand for such goods which has also prompted infringers to take undue advantage of reputed brand owners by using either an identical or a deceptively similar mark for their products.

In one such instance, the Delhi High Court has passed a decree of permanent injunction against the use of the mark DEVTOL in a suit filed by Reckitt Benckiser asserting infringement of its well-known trade mark DETTOL.

The hearing on the injunction application was conducted by video conferencing. The suit was filed against the infringing mark and logo DEVTOL. The plaintiff’s and defendant’s marks are shown above.

During the hearing, the defendant agreed not to manufacture and/or sell the product i.e. hand sanitizer, under the infringing mark. It was also informed that the defendant had already asked its agents and dealers to withdraw the infringing product from the market.

Accordingly, the suit was decreed in favour of the plaintiff and the defendant was restrained from using the infringing mark and was directed to deposit a sum of Rs 1,00,000 (€1,175, $1,325) to the Juvenile Justice Fund.

During this crisis, the courts have recognized the importance of holding hearings through video conferencing. The Delhi High Court, which hears and adjudicates on a high number of IP suits, has been the most favoured forum to obtain relief against infringing products during this unprecedented time.

As in the present case, brand owners when faced with counterfeit/infringing products can approach the courts citing urgency and can seek relief in the form of injunction during this pandemic.

When the products are related to the healthcare industry, the urgent hearing through video conferencing against the infringers and counterfeiters could be obtained in order to prevent losses and damages but also because such goods may be detrimental to public health due to sub-standard quality.

By Manisha Singh and Omesh Puri of Lex Orbis

Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 11.13
Tags: DETTOL, DEVTOL, COVID-19, Delhi High Court,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA4875
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment

MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.

The Class 46 Archive








+44 (0)116 2747355
+44 (0)116 2747365

Unit Q, Troon Way Business Centre
Humberstone Lane, Leicester


Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
Robert Harrison

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox