Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
MONDAY, 29 APRIL 2019
New Trade Marks Act in Finland

The Finnish Trade Marks Act will be fully reformed. The new Act was ratified by the President of Finland on 26 April 2019, and it will come into force on 1 May 2019.

Although the main driver for the reform has been the implementation of the new EU Trade Mark Directive ((EU) 2015/2436) and Singapore Treaty (Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks 2006), the reform is most welcomed, since the previous Trade Marks Act was enacted in 1964. Even though there have been a number of partial reforms of the Act over the years, its structure is somewhat outdated and unclear and the provisions do not fully comply with the EU case law.

The new Act will introduce several significant changes to opposition and invalidation proceedings, requirements for the specification of goods and services, representation requirements of a trade mark, treatment of goods in transit, and more.

Requirement to amend the lists of goods and services of registrations registered before 2014 containing Nice class heading

According to the old Finnish trade mark practice, trade mark registrations that contain a Nice class heading in the list of goods and services enjoy protection for all goods and services falling into that specific class. This interpretation was changed on 1 October 2012 for new applications as a consequence of the CJEU’s decision in the IP TRANSLATOR case (C-307/10).

For applications filed between 1 October 2012 and 31 December 2013, the applicants were able to use the Nice class heading as a part of the lists of goods and services, and make an additional claim according to which the application is intended to cover the full Nice alphabetical list of goods/services of that specific class.

For applications filed after 1 January 2014, where the application contain only the Nice class heading in the list of goods/services, the scope of protection is limited to those goods and services that are clearly covered in the literal wording of the class heading.

As a consequence, it has become difficult to interpret the actual scope of protection of a Finnish trade mark registration containing a Nice class heading in the list of goods and services, as this depends on when the application was filed.

In order to clarify the current situation, the new Act offers an opportunity to specify the lists of goods and services of those trade mark registrations that were filed before 1 January 2014 with a full Nice class heading (or a class heading and a claim that the full Nice alphabetical list is covered).

The owners of those registrations can specify the list by listing all goods/services falling into that class that were intended to be covered by the registration. Unlike the similar reform made to EUTMs, the list is not restricted to cover only those goods and services that were included in the Nice alphabetical list at the time of the filing of the application (except for those applications that were filed between 1 October 2012 and 31 December 2013 and that contain a reference to the Nice alphabetical list).

The final deadline for requesting the specification is the first renewal of the registration after the enactment of the new Act. If no specification is requested, the scope of protection of the trade mark registration is limited to those goods and services that are clearly covered in the literal wording of the class heading in question. This does not, however, apply to applications filed between 1 October 2012 and 31 December 2013 containing also references to the Nice alphabetical list. If the owner of such a registration does not request specification, the Office will confirm that each class of the registration covers all the goods and services of the Nice alphabetical list and remove references to the Nice alphabetical list.

It is notable that the requirement also applies to International Registrations that were designated to Finland before 1 October 2012 and that cover a full Nice class heading in their list of goods and services.

Administrative invalidation and revocation of trade mark and trade name registrations

According to the old Trade Marks Act, trade mark and trade name registrations could only be invalidated or revoked by the Market Court. The new Act introduces the possibility to file an administrative invalidation or revocation action against a trade mark or trade name registration.

If the administrative action is filed, the decision is made by the Finnish Board of Patent and Registration, with a Market Court as the appeal court. The invalidation or revocation action may also be filed directly with the Market Court. If an action is filed in both instances, the Board of Patent and Registration has to cease examination of the action, and the matter will be decided by the Market Court.

The revised Trade Name Act also enables the partial invalidation of trade names on the basis of five years of non-use, which was not possible in accordance of the old Act.

Reformation of opposition proceedings

As part of the implementation of the Directive, the new Act streamlines the trade mark opposition proceedings by making it possible for the applicant to request the opponent to prove the use of an earlier right that has been registered more than five years ago.

According to the old Trade Marks Act, the validity of the earlier right could only be questioned by filing a non-use invalidation action against it.

The new Act also introduces some additional changes to the opposition proceedings, including the possibility for the parties to request a suspension of the proceedings by a joint request.

Changes to the representation of the mark

The new Act abolishes the requirement for the graphical representation of a mark. According to the new Act, a trade mark may consist of any signs, in particular words, including personal names, or designs, letters, numerals, colours, the shape of goods or of the packaging of goods, or sounds, provided that such signs are capable of:

distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings; and

being represented on the register in a manner which enables the competent authorities and the public to determine the clear and precise subject matter of the protection afforded to its proprietor.

In addition, the new Act limits the scope of protection of the new black and white figurative marks, which in the future will only cover black and white versions of the mark. The new provisions have no impact on the old black and white registrations, which continue to protect all colour variations of a figurative mark.

Goods in transit

The provisions regarding goods in transit have been clarified in accordance with the Directive.

According to the new Act, a trade mark owner can prevent all third parties from bringing goods into Finland, even if the goods are only in transit, if such goods bear an identical or similar mark. However, this entitlement lapses if the holder of the goods provides evidence that the trade mark owner is not entitled to prohibit the placing of the goods on the market of the country of final destination. 

Conclusions

The new Act provides welcome clarification to the Finnish trade mark system, and it is expected to smoothen and streamline several parts of the trade mark proceedings – including opposition, invalidation and revocation actions.

However, especially the provisions regarding the specification of the lists of goods and services of trade mark registrations containing Nice class heading put a lot of pressure on the holders of old Finnish trade mark registrations (and International Registrations designating Finland). It is vital to ensure that the scope of protection of old trade mark registrations is not inadvertently narrowed.

Post written for Class 46 by Kaisu Korpua and Markku Tuominen of Roschier, Helsinki

Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 16.47
Tags: Finland, Trade Marks Act, Trade Mark Directive, IP TRANSLATOR,
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA4734

MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
+44 (0)116 2747365
POST ADDRESS

Unit Q, Troon Way Business Centre
Humberstone Lane, Leicester
LE4 9HA

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
NEWSLETTER

Signup for our newsletter.
Weekly headlines delivered to your inbox