Log in


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
Bundesgerichtshof: It is not over yet for the packet in the pocket

In yesterday's decision, the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) annulled two rulings of the German Federal Patent Court (BPatG) that held both three-dimensional signs depicted below not to be eligible for protection as trade marks.

The packaging shapes (which differ in minor details upon closer inspection) had initially been accepted as 3D marks for chocolate in Class 30 by the German Patent and Trade Mark Office. Subsequently, the Office rejected two applications for declaration of invalidity directed against the registrations.

But the BPatG upheld the appeals filed by the invalidity applicant against the decisions of the Office. The BPatG argued that the squared shape of the packaging could not be protected as a trade mark because it fell foul of the requirements set out in Section 3(2) no. 1 of the German Trade Mark Act. That provision gives effect to Article 3(1)(e)(i) of the Trade Mark Directive 2008/95/EC which states that signs are liable to be declared invalid if they consist exclusively of the shape which results from the nature of the goods themselves.

The BPatG found that Section 3(2) no. 1 of the German Trade Mark Act had to be applied to the marks at issue even though they did not consist of the shape of the product itself but of the product's packaging. According to the BPatG, for the above-mentioned provision to be applicable it was sufficient that the shape of the actual product underneath the packaging at issue was clearly recognisable.

Referring to the principles established by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Tripp Trapp (Case C‑205/13), the BPatG held that the shape of the marks in question resulted from the nature of the goods themselves, because the shape contained an essential characteristic which consumers might be looking for in the products of competitors. More specifically, the BPatG found that the square shape of the chocolate offered advantages to consumers, for instance, if they tried to keep the chocolate in the pocket of a jacket.

Yesterday, the Bundesgerichtshof annulled the rulings of the BPatG. The Bundesgerichtshof saw no reason to answer the question of whether Section 3(2) no. 1 of the German Trade Mark Act was applicable also to trade marks consisting of the shape of a product's packaging. This question could remain unanswered, in the opinion of the Bundesgerichtshof, because the squared shape of the chocolate did not constitute an essential functional characteristic of chocolate. Consequently, the Bundesgerichtshof referred the cases back to the BPatG which will now have to decide on the remaining issues.

The press release of the Bundesgerichtshof can be found here (in German).

Posted by: Christian Tenkhoff @ 09.32
Tags: Bundesgerichtshof, BGH, BPatG, Germany, Shape, 3D Mark,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA4556
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment

MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.

The Class 46 Archive








+44 (0)116 2747355

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE


Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
Robert Harrison

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox