Log in


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
EU trade mark reform round 2: changes on 1st October

There are important changes affecting EU trade marks coming into force on 1st October. Members of the MARQUES European Trade Mark Law & Practice Team have been monitoring these changes and providing input on them. Chair Robert Guthrie and Vice-Chair Petra Goldenbaum provide a guide for Class 46 readers:


The EU Trade Mark Regulation was amended in March 2016, but a number of those amendments will only start to apply on 1st October 2017. On this date, a codified version of the EU Trade Mark Regulation will come into force, as well as two pieces of secondary legislation – an Implementing Regulation and a Delegated Regulation – which supplement the provisions of the EU Trade Mark Regulation and replace the existing Implementing Regulation.

The MARQUES European Trade Mark Law & Practice Team reviewed the EU Commission’s initial drafts of the Implementing Regulation and the Delegated Regulation and provided comments on the same. Copies of MARQUES’ comments are available on the EU Trade Mark Reform Task Force page of the MARQUES website.

What are the changes?

The codification of the EU Trade Mark Regulation means that many of the current Article numbers in the regulation will change. The two main substantive changes that will start to apply on 1st October 2017 are:

• The abolition of the requirement for trade marks to be represented graphically and the introduction (in the Implementing Regulation) of new representation requirements for different types of marks, eg sound marks must be represented by submitting an audio file reproducing the sound or by an accurate representation of the sound in musical notation.

• The creation of EU certification marks – which are marks that do not indicate trade origin but rather that goods or services have been certified by the proprietor as having certain characteristics.

There are also a large number of procedural changes. These include:

• Making acquired distinctiveness a subsidiary claim – which means that evidence of acquired distinctiveness will only have to be provided when a claim to inherent distinctiveness has been rejected and all grounds for appeal exhausted.

• Relaxation of some of the substantiation and translation requirements – in particular to allow a greater reliance on online databases such as TMView.

• Aligning the procedural rules for revocation and validity actions more closely with those for oppositions.

• Amending the procedural rules for appeals to the Boards of Appeal.

• Amending the rules on means of communication with the EUIPO.

• The imposition of more stringent rules on presenting evidence attached to submissions – including requirements to provide an index of the evidence relied upon.

• The abolition of the certification requirement for seniority claims.

• New rules on belated evidence of substantiation and proof of use.

The EUIPO has provided an explanation of the main changes on its website.

Many of the above changes will give rise to significant changes in the Office Guidelines and MARQUES’s European Trade Mark Law & Practice Team has reviewed these changes and provided comments and suggestions to the EUIPO. 

What do trade mark owners and their advisors need to do?

Owners of some forms of non-traditional marks, such as sound marks, motion marks or position marks, may wish to consider whether to file new applications in accordance with the new representation requirements, as this might provide greater clarity as to the sign that is the subject of protection.

Those organisations who administer certification marks, which may already be protected as such at a national level, will also want to consider whether they should be protecting them as EU certification marks.

Trade mark owners and their advisors will also need to ensure that they are aware of and comply with the new procedural rules. The most likely area for error is probably around the more stringent rules on presenting evidence, especially as standard form submissions and evidence relied upon previously may no longer be compliant and will need to be changed.

Robert Guthrie is a partner of Osborne Clarke and chair of the MARQUES European Trade Mark Law and Practice Team. Petra Goldenbaum is counsel at CMS Hasche Sigle, Vice-Chair of the Team and head of the Trade Mark Reform Sub-Team

Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 10.58
Tags: EUTM, Trade Mark Regulation, EUIPO, certification marks,
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA4524

MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.

The Class 46 Archive








+44 (0)116 2747355
+44 (0)116 2747365

Unit Q, Troon Way Business Centre
Humberstone Lane, Leicester


Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
Robert Harrison

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox