Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schr÷ter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
THURSDAY, 16 JUNE 2016
General Court: lack of genuine use for the culÚs v Kule

For all the Euro football fans, the General Court played its part on the field today with a case related to one of the great football clubs of the EU.  The Court dismissed the appeal in Case T‑614/14 regarding the sign KULE and whether it could be blocked by the earlier marks for the word CULE.

The opposition was between the following parties

Kule LLC (USA) - EU TM applicant

Fútbol Club Barcelona (Spain) - Opponent

KULE

earlier Spanish marks for CULE

- No 1021594 registered for Class 14

- No 1021596, designating goods in Class 18

- No 2716946, designating goods in Class 25

- non-registered word mark CULE, well known in Spain within the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention

Class 14: ‘Precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, not included in other classes; Jewellery, precious stones; Horological and chronometric instruments’;

 Class 18: ‘Leather and imitations of leather, and goods made of these materials and not included in other classes; Animal skins, hides; Backpacks; Handbags; Purses; Trunks and travelling bags; Umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; Wallets; Whips, harness and saddlery’;

 Class 25: ‘Clothing, footwear, headgear’.

 

 

 

The Opposition Division and Board of Appeal rejected the opposition based on the lack of genuine use of the earlier trade marks for the purposes of Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009.

As a reminder, proof of use must consist of indications concerning the place, time, extent and nature of use of the earlier trade marks for 5 years preceding the date of application of the contested mark, in this case 23 August 2011.

 The opponent produced the following documents

–        an extract from the Spanish dictionary of the Real Academia Española which defines the term ‘culé’;

–        five print-outs from websites dedicated to sports news in Spain making reference to Fútbol Club Barcelona and its supporters or players, nicknamed ‘culés’;

–        a print-out from a website making reference to Fútbol Club Barcelona and the ‘lotería culé’;

–        a print-out from Wikipedia containing information on Fútbol Club Barcelona and stating that its supporters are nicknamed ‘culé[s]’;

–        two other print-outs from websites dedicated to sports news in Spain and making reference to Fútbol Club Barcelona and its supporters or players, nicknamed ‘culés’;

–        a print-out of a Google search for the term ‘culé’ showing five references, two of which refer to an open online dictionary forum and two of which refer to Fútbol Club Barcelona.

The opponent argued that the evidence produced shows that its earlier trade marks are widely used to identify Fútbol Club Barcelona and that they are used on the market by certain licence-holders in order to distinguish clothes and accessories. However, no evidence regarding the alleged licences were produced.

However, the General Court upheld the reasoning of the EUIPO.

Regarding the earlier registered Spanish trade marks, the documents filed did not demonstrate genuine use of the earlier trade marks for the purposes of Article 42(2) of EUTMR and Rule 22(2) of EUTMIR. First, the documents submitted did not demonstrate use of the earlier trade marks in relation to the goods concerned and some documents were submitted out of time so they could not be taken into account as evidence of genuine use.

Regarding the earlier well-known trade mark,  the documents submitted by the opponent within the relevant period merely show that the Spanish word ‘culé’ is used in relation to the Spanish football club FC Barcelona, particularly as the nickname used for its supporters.  Such use does not constitute genuine use of the mark ‘CULE’ in Spain, and a fortiori, does not prove that this mark is well-known in that country.

What does CULE mean ? see here 

Keeping up with football in 2016 here

Posted by: Laetitia Lagarde @ 18.13
Tags: general court, genuine use, cule, barcelona, kule,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA4383
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
+44 (0)116 2747365
POST ADDRESS

Unit Q, Troon Way Business Centre
Humberstone Lane, Leicester
LE4 9HA

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox