Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
MONDAY, 2 NOVEMBER 2015
General Court: She invalidates Figurative Cushe

In Case T-642/13, the General Court dismissed the appeal in the following invalidity action.

Wolverine International, LP

BH Store BV -earlier German marks

Image not found

SHE

Image not found

‘clothing, footwear and headgear’ in Class 25

Classes 3, 9, 16, 18 and 25 including 'clothing, footwear and headgear’

 

OHIM and the Court upheld the invalidity action, finding that there is a likelihood of confusion within the meaning of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

 As regards whether the earlier word mark had been put to genuine use, the opponent had proved such use for the goods ‘clothing and footwear’.

With regard to the likelihood of confusion, the goods at issue to be similar or identical. The marks are phonetically identical and visually and conceptually similar, in so far as the marks at issue share the word element ‘she’ and the earlier word mark is made up exclusively of that element.

 Moreover, the earlier word mark has a low degree of distinctive character. However, according to well-established case-law, it is common in the clothing sector for the same mark to be configured in various ways according to the type of product which it designates. It is also common for a single clothing manufacturer to use sub-braands in order to distinguish its various lines from one another. In the present case, the mark at issue consists of the same word sign as the earlier word mark and differs from it solely by a figurative element without particular meaning could be perceived as a particular configuration of the earlier word mark . So the goods covered by the mark at issue could be perceived by the relevant public as originating from the same undertaking or undertakings economically linked to the earlier word mark.

Posted by: Laetitia Lagarde @ 17.53
Tags: General court, she, cushe, confusion,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA4223
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
+44 (0)116 2747365
POST ADDRESS

Unit Q, Troon Way Business Centre
Humberstone Lane, Leicester
LE4 9HA

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox