Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
WEDNESDAY, 8 APRIL 2015
Switzerland. Administrative Court keeps correcting IPO on geographic indications

In two recent decisions, the Federal Administrative Court allowed the registration of marks that had been considered deceptive by the Swiss IPO because they contained geographic indications, and the claimed goods did not originate from the designated place.

In the first case, Hennes & Mauritz sought to register COS (fig, see above) for clothing and accessories. The IPO held that the sign was understood as a reference to the Greek island Cos, and therefore misleading. The Administrative Court agreed with the IPO that Cos would be understood as a reference to the Greek island of the same name, which was a well-known holiday destination. However, the mark COS, in capitalized letters, would not primarily be understood as a reference to the geographic place: consumers were well accustomed to trade marks using three letter acronyms in capitals (the court mentions IBM, UPS, SAP, BMW, DHL, KFC and UBS, and specifically for the fashion industry GAP, H&M, HIS, A&F, OXMO, DKNY, CAT, NIO and NIX) and would therefore understand the mark as an acronym formed by C-O-S. If the term was given a meaning, it would be understood as a reference to the trigonometric function cosine, which was abbreviated cos or COS. The sign COS (fig.) was therefore neither descriptive nor deceptive for the claimed (fashion) goods.

In the second case, the applicant sought to register "STRELA" for clothing and fashion accessories. The IPO refused because "Strela" is the name of a mountain (pass) in the Swiss canton Grison (part of a ski resort in Davos). The Administrative Court again corrected: Strela was not suitable for the production of the goods in question and therefore could be registered under the "YUKON" criteria of the Supreme Court. It was not well known enough to serve as an indirect indication of geographic origin (such as MATTERHORN).

Both decisions seem sensible enough. They show, once again, that this is an area where the Administrative Court is willing to correct the overly strict practice of the IPO.

The decisions are not final, they can be appealed to the Supreme Court by the IPO. However, as the outcome turns on facts - the primary understanding of the marks by the relevant public -  and the Supreme Court is bound by the fact finding of the lower court, an appeal is probably pointless.

Decision COS of 2 March 2015 (summary, in German)

Decision STRELA of 18 February 2015 (PDF, in German)

Posted by: Mark Schweizer @ 11.10
Tags: Switzerland, absolute grounds of refusal,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA4054
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
POST ADDRESS

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox