Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
SATURDAY, 14 MARCH 2015
General Court: how many flats are too many?

In Case T-713/13, the following opposition was appealed before the GC :

9Flats GmbH (Germany)

Tibesoca SL (earlier Spanish marks)

9flats.com

Classes 36, 38, 39 and 43

Class 43 including accomodation and travel services

 

The relevant territory is Spain and the relevant public is the general public, reasonably well informed and reasonably observant and circumspect, showing an average level of attention.

Regarding the comparison of the services at issue, the Board of Appeal upheld the finding of the Opposition Division relating to services deemed identical or similar, with the exception of ‘services' rental and / or brokerage of sports equipment, namely diving equipment, water sports for equipment rental and / or brokerage of sports equipment, namely bicycle "in Class 39 covered by the mark applied for.

Regarding the comparison of the signs, the Board of Appeal considered that they are similar visually and phonetically, but not conceptually. First, with regard to the applicant's argument that the Spanish public would understand the meaning of the word "flats" to mean a dwelling, it is a simple unsupported assertion. The cases relied on by the applicant, on the understanding of English in the Scandinavian countries, the Netherlands and Finland, is not relevant in assessing the understanding of this language by the Spanish public. In this regard, the Court, however, considered that the degree of familiarity of the Spanish public with the English language was generally held low (see Judgment of 18 April 2007 House of Donuts / OHIM). The word "Flats" is not a base word in the English language, the Board of Appeal rightly considered that it would be understood by the Spanish public. Therefore, is also irrelevant the applicant's argument that the word "casa", which is the Spanish translation of the English word "Flats" is descriptive for hosting services.

 Next, as regards the applicant's argument that the element "Flats" is descriptive in the English language, and must remain available throughout the Union, it suffices to note that the fact that there for economic operators, the need for availability of a sign can not be part of the relevant factors in assessing the existence of a risk of confusion

Consequently, since the earlier mark has a normal distinctive character, the Board of Appeal rightly concluded that, as regards the services in question considered as identical or similar, there was a likelihood of confusion between the signs.

 

Posted by: Laetitia Lagarde @ 15.13
Tags: General Court, likelihood of confusion, 9flats; 50flats; ,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA4034
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
+44 (0)116 2747365
POST ADDRESS

Unit Q, Troon Way Business Centre
Humberstone Lane, Leicester
LE4 9HA

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox