Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
THURSDAY, 4 SEPTEMBER 2014
General Court: 2 lines, 4 and 5 stars

In joined cases T-687/13, Unibail Management applied for the following figurative signs for various goods and services in Classes 16, 35, 36, 38, 39, 41, 42 and 43.

OHIM’s examiner and the Board of Appeal rejected the trademark applications on the Article 7 (1) b) CTMR absolute grounds for lack of distinctive character.  In particular, it held that in view of all products and all services involved, the marks applied for contained no element which could differentiate them from other representations of stars and lines and attract specifically the public’s attention. The great simplicity of the decorative pattern could not be seen as sufficient nuance to allow the relevant public to identify the commercial origin of the goods and services concerned. Specifically for the products and services in Classes 16, 35, 36, 38, 39, 41 and 42, it noted that the mark applied for would inform the relevant public that such products and such services had a level of quality worthy of the label "four star" or may have been rewarded with a label of the highest quality, luxury, or even that they enjoyed high prestige. In this regard, it noted that the use of stars was not limited to hotel services, but encountered in other sectors. OHIM relied, in this context, the practical experience generally acquired.

However, the General Court annulled the BoA’s decision because the Board failed to examine the distinctive character of the signs in relation to each good and service and only adopted an overall motivation. The GC sent it to back to OHIM for further examination.

Posted by: Laetitia Lagarde @ 12.00
Tags: General court, absolute grounds, 4 star, 5 stars, article 7 (1) b),
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA3834
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
+44 (0)116 2747365
POST ADDRESS

Unit Q, Troon Way Business Centre
Humberstone Lane, Leicester
LE4 9HA

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox