Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
Who we all are...
TUESDAY, 11 MARCH 2014
General Court: GE (fig) v GE
In case T-520/11, Genebre SA (Spain) applied for the figurative mark (represented below right) for various metal goods, water pipes,valves and hoses, among others, in Classes 6, 7, 9, 11 and 17
General Electric Company (USA) opposed it on the basis of several earlier marks including the UK word mark GE registered for goods in Classes 6,7,9,11 and 17.
The Opposition Division rejected the opposition. The Board of Appeal cancelled the decision upholding the opposition on the basis of the earlier UK sign. For the English-speaking public with average and high attention, due to the identical goods and the average similarity from a visual point of view and identity from an aural point of view (being conceptually neutral), the graphic differences in the contested CTM are not sufficient to exclude any likelihood of confusion according to Article 8(1) b)CMTR. Therefore, it is not necessary to look at the 8(5)CTMR ground.
The General Court dismissed the appeal, confirming the reasoning of the BoA that the public will perceive the contested CTM as the letters G and E and not as fanciful sign representing water valves, thus finding a similarity between the signs.
Posted by: Laetitia Lagarde @ 17.45
General Court, likelihood of confusion, GE, general electric company,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment
MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.
The Class 46 Archive