Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
Who we all are...
TUESDAY, 12 NOVEMBER 2013
Life after IP TRANSLATOR: OHIM amends its Manual
The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) has helpfully issued a circular concerning a recent update of its Manual, to explain how OHIM is dealing with Nice class headings in the wake of the Court of Justice of the European Union ruling in Case C-307/10 Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (the IP Translator case). This is what OHIM says:
Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 22.52
Class headings, IP Translator, OHIM practice,
Manual of Trade Mark Practice: Part B: Examination Section 3: Classification
This part of the Manual of Trade Mark Practice has been amended. It has been
published on 04/11/2013 in part B.3. of OHIM’s Manual concerning Examination of
Classification of Goods and Services. These changes will enter into force on 25
Manual of Trade Mark Practice
Following the publication of the IP Translator judgment in June 2012, OHIM
and the EU National IP Offices have been discussing the interpretation of the
Nice class headings in various meetings. In May 2013, in under a year, all
general indications of the Nice class headings were reviewed and agreement was
reached that 11 general indications do not follow the requirements of clarity
and precision as set out in the IP Translator judgment.
Those general indications will no longer be accepted without further
specification. The remaining 186 general indications of the Nice class headings
are considered acceptable for classification. The new practice, including the
refusal of claims like “all goods in class x”, has been reflected in OHIM’s
Manual on Trade Mark Practice and will enter into force as soon as OHIM’s
launches its new website and new e-filing tool at the end of November.
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment
MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.
The Class 46 Archive