Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
Who we all are...
WEDNESDAY, 6 NOVEMBER 2013
General Court: sterilina v sterillium
In Case T-114/12, the General Court dismissed the appeal regarding the following opposition:
CTM Applicant- Laros srl (Italy)
Opponent-Bode Chemie GmbH (Germany)
Goods in classes 3 and 5
STERILLIUM for several goods in Class 5
For ‘disinfectants’ in Class 5
The Opposition Division and 4th BoA both found there was no likelihood of confusion due to the differences between the trademarks. Even if the marks share a slight similarity from a visual point of view, a medium one from an aural point of view and some conceptual similarity due to the common prefix “steril”, the latter has a weak distinctive character for medical goods and the other elements, including figurative, are sufficient to differentiate the signs.
Finally, the opponent did not bring sufficient evidence that the earlier right was well-known in Germany or France.
Posted by: Laetitia Lagarde @ 17.03
General Court, likelihood of confusion, sterilina, sterillium ,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment
MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.
The Class 46 Archive