Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
WEDNESDAY, 21 AUGUST 2013
General Court: Member of EURO EXPERTS

In Case T-3/12, Mr. Heinrich Kreyenberg had applied for registration of the following mark for goods and services in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 39, 41, 42, 44 and 45

Image not found

The mark was registered despite the written observations submitted by the European Commission which then initiated invalidity proceedings on the basis of Article 7(1) h), i) and c) CTMR and various protected emblems of the EU, including the following:Image not found Image not found

The Cancellation Division dismissed the invalidity application. The EU commission successfully appealed before the Board of Appeal which annulled the trade mark on the basis of the “communication on the use of the€ symbol” (represented above)  and Article 7 (1) i) CTMR which states “trade marks which include badges, emblems or escutcheons other than those covered by Article 6ter of the Paris Convention and which are of particular public interest, unless the consent of the competent authority to their registration has been given”.

The BoA found that the contested trademark contained the semi-crown of stars which suggested the idea of the EU and due to the variety of goods and services belonging to the competence of the EU, the consumer could be mislead to believe there is a link the CTM proprietor and EU institutions. In addition, the verbal element “member of Euro experts” reinforced that impression as it referred to an “official approved” member. The General Court dismissed the appeal by the CTM proprietor, and confirmed that
Article 7 (1) i) like Art. 7 (1) h) protects not only identical representations of protected symbols but also an altered imitation. Therefore, the inclusion of the EURO symbol which according to Art. 3 (4) of the TEU, identifies the legal entity of the EU, constitutes a violation of the CTMR.

Posted by: Laetitia Lagarde @ 02.33
Tags: General court, EU symbols, member of euro experts,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA3321
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
+44 (0)116 2747365
POST ADDRESS

Unit Q, Troon Way Business Centre
Humberstone Lane, Leicester
LE4 9HA

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox