Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
Who we all are...
TUESDAY, 12 MARCH 2013
Wild West General Court: Fairwild v Wild
In Case T- 247/11, FairWild Foundation (Switzerland) had registered the word mark FAIRWILD for numerous goods in Classes 3,5, 29 and 30.
The opponent Rudolf Wild GmbH & Co. KG filed an opposition on the grounds of Article 8 (1) (b) CTMR on the basis of earlier word CTM “WILD” registered for classes 3, 5, 29, 30 and 32.
The Opposition Division had partially upheld the opposition and the Board of Appeal upheld the opposition on its entirety for all the contested goods.
The General Court rejected the Applicant’s appeal, confirming there is a likelihood of confusion between the word signs for similar or identical goods, given the average degree of similarity. Indeed, the marks share a common element so they are overall similar from a visual and aural point of view. There is no conceptual comparison possible since WILD will be perceived as a fantasy word, except for the English and German-speaking consumer.
Posted by: Laetitia Lagarde @ 17.20
general court, likelihood of confusion, fairwild, wild,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment
MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.
The Class 46 Archive