Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
WEDNESDAY, 4 JULY 2012
The Turkish tale of Wittmann and Littmann

The owner of the LITTMANN trade mark, which was registered for “surgical, medical, dental and veterinary apparatus, instruments and furniture” in class 10, filed an opposition against an application to register the words WITTMANN PATCH in Turkey for similar goods.  The ground of opposition was that there was a likelihood of confusion, given the similarity of the respective marks.

The Turkish Patent Institute Trade Marks Directorate dismissed the opposition, citing the dissimilarity of the trade marks. The opponent then appealed to the Re-Examination and Evaluation Board of TPI.

Contrary to the narrow interpretation of Trade Mark Directorate on the issue of similarity, the Re-Examination Board decided that there was indeed a likelihood of confusion on the part of relevant public in terms of the “distinctive” elements of the LITTMANN and WITTMANN PATCH trade marks.

According to the Board, the word PATCH in the WITTMANN PATCH trade mark actually means “plaster”, which is a generic term and can not be accepted as a distinctive element in the WITTMANN PATCH application. The similarity examination should therefore be conducted between the words LITTMANN and WITTMANN. Having made this comparison it was apparent that the words WITTMANN and LITTMANN were both written in the same style and in capital letters. The fact that the words commenced with different letters was an insufficient basis on which to distinguish them.

There was accordingly a likelihood of confusion at the part of the average consumer between the trade marks in respect of the same or similar goods. 

Source: Selin Sinem Yalıncaklı (Mehmet Gun & Partners, Istanbul, Turkey)

Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 08.31
Tags: Turkey, confusing similarity,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA2877
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
+44 (0)116 2747365
POST ADDRESS

Unit Q, Troon Way Business Centre
Humberstone Lane, Leicester
LE4 9HA

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox