Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
WEDNESDAY, 25 APRIL 2012
Misleading business names: UK government gives advice
The Office of Fair Trading (OFT), a government department in the UK, has issued a document, "Misleading or Otherwise Undesirable Names", under its powers under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. This 23-page document deals with all forms of unsuitability of business names. It does not specifically address issues of trade mark law and makes this clear:

4.15 The OFT has no power to protect 'title' to a name on behalf of a business. The protection of its trade marks or goodwill is of itself a matter for individual businesses to address. We will only challenge the use of the same name in the licences of totally separate entities, where there is no arrangement between them, and/or when we have reason to believe consumers will be, or are likely to be, misled as to the person with whom they are dealing. 

However, the OFT recognises that there are times when choice of a name can have substantial repercussions for an IP owner and for the consumer, as when a business wants to trade under a brand which it does not own but with which it may be associated -- for example where it is a franchisee or licensee if a well-known brand. On issues such as this the OFT says

4.19 We have considered our policy on this issue and taken the view that associated businesses may use a common trading name provided that this is reflective of the true nature of their commercial relationship (rather than one business 'passing itself off' as having an association with another business/brand where no such association exists or otherwise misrepresenting the nature of its relationship with another business).

Given that a business name that is misleading or deceptive may not be entitled to protection as a registered trade mark to the extent that this is the case, the OFT guidelines may be of assistance to trade mark examiners and others.
Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 18.16
Tags: misleading business names,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA2812
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
+44 (0)116 2747365
POST ADDRESS

Unit Q, Troon Way Business Centre
Humberstone Lane, Leicester
LE4 9HA

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox