CLASS 46
Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.
Click here subscribe for free.
Who we all are...
THURSDAY, 19 APRIL 2012
Wintersteiger: CJEU rules on international keyword jurisdiction dispute
This morning, in Case C‑523/10 Wintersteiger AG v Products 4U Sondermaschinenbau GmbH, on a reference from Austria, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on where a trade mark infringement action might be brought in Austria by an Austrian company, which held trade marks both in Austria and Germany, against a German company which had reserved one of its trade marks as a search term for the search engine's ".de" service, considering both countries spoke the same language and that search results from ".de" would be received by Austrian internet users who used that trade mark as a search term. The Court ruled as follows:
Tags: CJEU ruling, AdWords, jurisdiction,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA2805
Wintersteiger: CJEU rules on international keyword jurisdiction dispute
This morning, in Case C‑523/10 Wintersteiger AG v Products 4U Sondermaschinenbau GmbH, on a reference from Austria, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on where a trade mark infringement action might be brought in Austria by an Austrian company, which held trade marks both in Austria and Germany, against a German company which had reserved one of its trade marks as a search term for the search engine's ".de" service, considering both countries spoke the same language and that search results from ".de" would be received by Austrian internet users who used that trade mark as a search term. The Court ruled as follows:
Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 11.00"Article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that an action relating to infringement of a trade mark registered in a Member State because of the use, by an advertiser, of a keyword identical to that trade mark on a search engine website operating under a country-specific top-level domain of another Member State may be brought before either the courts of the Member State in which the trade mark is registered or the courts of the Member State of the place of establishment of the advertiser".
Tags: CJEU ruling, AdWords, jurisdiction,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA2805
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment
MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.
The Class 46 Archive