Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
Who we all are...
THURSDAY, 1 DECEMBER 2011
General Court: SE Sports Equipment v SE so easy
In Case T- 477/10, the Board of Appeal had annulled the decision from the Opposition Division finding a likelihood of confusion between the two signs represented hereunder for identical or similar goods in Classes 18 and 25:
v SE SO EASY
Contested CTM earlier German TM
The General Court annulled the contested decision and observed that the Board did not appreciate correctly the similarity between the signs, considering that there was only a low degree of similarity when globally there is at least a medium degree of similarity.
From a visual point of view, in both trademarks the group of letters “SE” does not have any specific meaning in the German language, so it has an average distinctive character. In addition, the consumer will be attracted by this element given its size, position, stylized font and the contrast with the red rectangle. On the other side, the elements “sports equipment”, being descriptive, and “ so easy” being laudatory, belong to basic English vocabulary and will be understood by the German public. The element © is descriptive and does not have any influence in the comparison. Thus the element SE is the most dominant element of the signs and there is an average degree of visual and high degree conceptual similarity between the signs.
Posted by: Laetitia Lagarde @ 16.23
General Court, likelihood of confusion, SE sports equipment, SE so easy,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment
MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.
The Class 46 Archive