Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
TUESDAY, 22 NOVEMBER 2011
General Court: Coto de Gomariz v EL COTO

In Case T-276/10, the Opponent El Coto de Rioja S.A. brought a cancellation action on the grounds of Article 8 (1) (b) CTMR on the basis of its earlier rights COTO DE IMAZ and EL COTO against the applied for figurative CTM:

                       

The Cancellation Division had found a likelihood of confusion for the identical goods ‘wines’ in Class 33. The Board of Appeal annulled the contested decision and held that the signs had a low degree of similarity, in particular because the word ‘COTO’ has a weak distinctive character in respect of the registered goods since it refers to a ‘delimited land to grow grapes used to produce wine’ and thus the figurative element in the contested CTM as well as additional words IMAZ and GOMARIZ possibly understood as qualifying surnames, compensate greatly for the coincidence in the word COTO.

The General Court annulled the Board of Appeal’s decision on the grounds that according to the Spanish dictionary of the Real Academia Española the term COTO does not exclusively refer to the lexical vocabulary of ‘wine production’ but also means among others ‘boundary stone’. Therefore the Board wrongly excluded to take into account the term COTO in the comparison of the signs which therefore have a certain degree of overall similarity. Furthermore in previous Judgment T-332/04 ('Coto d’Arcis'), the Court had already considered the higher degree of distinctiveness of the earlier rights for the Spanish consumer, and thus a likelihood of confusion cannot be excluded between the trademarks in question.

Posted by: Laetitia Lagarde @ 09.47
Tags: General Court, likelihood of confusion, El coto, Coto de Gomariz,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA2645
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
+44 (0)116 2747365
POST ADDRESS

Unit Q, Troon Way Business Centre
Humberstone Lane, Leicester
LE4 9HA

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox