Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
Who we all are...
MONDAY, 21 NOVEMBER 2011
General Court: Restore lacks distinctive character
In Case T-363/10, the General Court confirmed that RESTORE cannot be registered according to Article 7 (1) (c) CTMR because it is descriptive for Class 10 goods ‘surgery and medical instruments and apparatus; stents; catheter; insertion guide’.
The relevant public is the English-speaking specialized medical consumer for whom the applied for CTM constitutes a purely material and banal indication of the function of the goods and not an industrial origin. Indeed, the dictionaries define among others the verb ‘restore’ as meaning “re-establish (a previous right, practice or situation)” or “ to return someone to an earlier good condition or position”. Thus for this kind of goods which are used to restore the health of a hurt person or animal, this CTM application is descriptive.
Posted by: Laetitia Lagarde @ 20.45
General court, absolute grounds, restore, medical,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment
MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.
The Class 46 Archive