CLASS 46
Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.
Click here subscribe for free.
Who we all are...
FRIDAY, 21 OCTOBER 2011
La Sonrisa de Carmen y Bloom Clothes v OHMI
Tags: General court, likelihood of confusion, bloom clothes, bloom,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA2597
La Sonrisa de Carmen y Bloom Clothes v OHMI
In Judgment T-176/10, the General Court upheld the decision of the Board of Appeal founding likelihood of confusion between the figurative sign BLOOM CLOTHES (with a mushroom) and earlier German trademark BLOOM for identical goods in Class 25 and similar services in Class 35.
The signs in conflict are overall similar because the figurative element in the applied for CTM will be perceived as merely ornamental, the term ‘clothes’ is a basic English word understood by the relevant consumer which lacks distinctiveness, whereas ‘bloom’ will not be understood by the non English-speaking public and thus is the dominant element of the opposed CTM. Therefore, there is a likelihood of confusion for the German consumer.
Posted by: Laetitia Lagarde @ 10.02Tags: General court, likelihood of confusion, bloom clothes, bloom,



Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA2597
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment
MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.
The Class 46 Archive