Log in


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
Switzerland: (lack of) protection of famous marks in opposition proceedings

You-know-who opposed the registration of the above depicted trade mark for tea and coffee and machines for the preparation of beverages. Both the Swiss IPO as well as the Federal Administrative Court rejected the opposition.

The Administrative Court argued that the similarities between the marks (see the basis for opposition below) were insufficient to create a likelihood of confusion (they do not really address the similarity of goods, which in my opinion would have justified some explanation, but given the outcome, it doesn't matter). Not every association creates a likelihood of confusion.


The important part of the decision comes next. Coca Cola argued that because COCA COLA was a famous mark ("mark with a reputation" under EU law), it should enjoy added protection. The Court granted that COCA COLA was a mark with a reputation. However, famous marks did not enjoy special protection in opposition proceedings. Namely an (inferred) intent of the proprietor of the younger sign to free ride on the good will of the older mark could not be taken into account in opposition proceedings, which were designed to be relatively simple, quick proceedings. Issues of intent could only be addressed in ordinary civil proceedings before civil courts.

I guess the lesson for owners of marks with a reputation is not to rely on opposition proceedings when the similarities between the marks are not so great. The problem in many cases may be that, if the younger mark is not yet being used, it is questionable whether there is sufficient interest to bring a civil suit (mere registration of a similar mark does not necessarily create such an interest; the question is controversial in Switzerland and has not been finally settled).

Link to German summary of decision of 16 August 2011 (with further link to full text). 

Posted by: Mark Schweizer @ 09.32
Tags: Switzerland, famous marks, marks with a reputation, opposition proceedings,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA2514
Reader Comments: 1
Post a Comment

Submitted By: Nikos G Prentoulis
01 September 2011 @ 18.50
Just a note under Greek law. Protection against harm to the repute of famous marks is provided for in opposition proceedings in Greece. However, I don't think the Greek TM Office and/or the Greek administrative courts would have allowed Coca Cola's opposition, though I must say I do see Coca Cola pursued the case.

MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.

The Class 46 Archive








+44 (0)116 2747355

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE


Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
Robert Harrison

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox