Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
Who we all are...
THURSDAY, 2 JUNE 2011
Ancotel v. Acotel
In case T-408/09, the Court annulled the contested decision of the BOA which found likelihood of confusion (LOC) between the signs in conflict for services in Class 38:
Contested CTM Earlier right
The earlier mark is registered for ‘Telecommunications’ services, addressed to the general public as well as a specialized public, whereas the contested CTM is addressed to a highly-specialized public (phone operators, radio diffusers).The Court censored the BOA for taking into account the point of view of the final average consumer, which is not concerned by the services of the contested CTM, and for whom LOC is by definition excluded. This issue is a question of law which cannot be examined for the first time by the General Court, which remands the case to OHIM.
Posted by: Laetitia Lagarde @ 14.28
General court, relevant public, ancotel,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment
MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.
The Class 46 Archive