Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
WEDNESDAY, 11 MAY 2011
French ski: competition in trademark court

The National Union for French Ski Instructors (SNMSF) registered the collective CTM ‘école du ski français’ for Classes 25, 28 and 41. The International Union for Ski instructors (SIMS) applied for a cancellation action on the grounds of Article 7 (1) (g) and (h) CTMR. In Judgment T-41/10, the General court upheld the decisions of OHIM, which rejected the action.

Firstly, Article 7 (1) (h) CTMR states that [shall not be registered] “trade marks which have not been authorised by the competent authorities and are to be refused pursuant to Article 6ter of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property”.

According to Article 6 ter (1) (a), “the countries of the Union agree to refuse or to invalidate the registration, [...]either as trademarks or as elements of trademarks, of armorial bearings, flags, and other State emblems, of the countries of the Union, official signs and hallmarks indicating control and warranty adopted by them, and any imitation from a heraldic point of view.”

In the present case, the Court held that in the contested CTM, the sole combination of the 3 colors of the French flag did not constitute an imitation “from a heraldic point of view”, given that the other characteristics of the flag are missing - i.e.: the rectangular or square shape, and the presence of the 3 stripes of equal width. In the sense of these articles, it is not relevant to examine whether the SNMSF aims at creating confusion between the sign and a reference to the French Republic; the global impression of the contested sign is remotely like the French flag, so that the relevant public will not perceive it as a replica.

Secondly, Article 7(1) (g) states that [shall not be registered] “trade marks which are of such a nature as to deceive the public, for instance as to the nature, quality or geographical origin of the goods or service”.

The Court concluded that the word element ‘école du ski français’ as well as the logo in blue, white, red colors do not have a deceitful nature for Class 41 services as the SNMSF is composed of instructors with a French certificate or who are authorized to exercise in France; further, the sector is competitive, thus the public will rather interpret the expression ‘ski français ‘ like meaning a ‘French method of skiing’, with particular characteristics than believe that the services are rendered by a public service of the French government.

For more action in Court than on the slopes for French ski Unions, go here.

Posted by: Laetitia Lagarde @ 16.43
Tags: General court, flag, french, ski,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA2377
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
+44 (0)116 2747365
POST ADDRESS

Unit Q, Troon Way Business Centre
Humberstone Lane, Leicester
LE4 9HA

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox