Log in


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
Comet v Comit

In Judgment T-84/08, the General Court upheld the finding of likelihood of confusion between word mark COMIT and figurative German trademark COMET. However, it annulled the contested decision to the extent it had dismissed appellant- Intesa SanPaolo Bank’s claim-for refusing to examine its ‘ancillary appeal’ according to Article 8(3) CTMR. OHIM contended that the Board had misapplied the rule laid down in the Regulation by overly limiting it and rejecting the claim on the grounds that it amounted to an appeal separate from the appeal lodged by the Opponent.

On the substance, the goods and services are identical, the trademarks are similar visually and phonetically, the figurative differences between the signs are too slight and do not alter impression of similarity between the almost identical word which form the sign and dominate them. Conceptually, the Court recognized that there are differences between the marks at issue, ‘comet’ will be understood as ‘komet’ by the German public which leads to a certain distinction. Nevertheless, the shared prefix ‘com’, denoting 'commerce' or 'commercial', is a widely-used abbreviation in the world of business- this point was noted at the hearing by appellant, insisting that its CTM application was made of ‘com’ and ‘it’ (for Italy) as such being a fantasy word. The Court concluded therefore that sharing the same prefix with an identical meaning, the conceptual differences were not enough as to cancel the visual and phonetic similarities.

Posted by: Laetitia Lagarde @ 02.23
Tags: General Cout, Likelihood of confusion,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA2328
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment

MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.

The Class 46 Archive








+44 (0)116 2747355
+44 (0)116 2747365

Unit Q, Troon Way Business Centre
Humberstone Lane, Leicester


Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
Robert Harrison

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox