Log in


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
Wrongful use of AdWord will infringe trade mark, rules Danish Court
In the recent dispute between Billedbutikken and Pixelpartner  (Case V-101-08, 17 November 2010), the Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court gave an important ruling on the use by a keyword purchaser of the controversial Google AdWords system.  Pixelpartner, an online photo development business since 2006 and an AdWords customer, used 'Billedbutikken' ('picture shop') as a search term.  However, the plaintiff Billedbutikken had used 'Billedbutikken' both as a name and as a trade mark for its photo development business since 1982, also trading online since 1999 at 'billedbutikken.dk'. Following Pixelpartner's purchase of 'Billedbutikken' as a search term, Pixelpartner's own website appeared at the top of the list of links to sponsored search results under 'Billedbutikken'.  

Billedbutikken sued for trade mark infringement and also under the  Danish Marketing Practices Act. Pixelpartner however argued that the term 'Billedbutikken' was merely descriptive and could be used freely by competitors.

The Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court held for Billedbutikken, which it considered to be among the major players in the online market for photo development, a field in which the number of competitors is limited. The trade mark 'Billedbutikken', if initially descriptive, had acquired a secondary meaning through intensive use and was accordingly protected under the Marketing Practices Act (markedsføringsloven) and had a broad scope of protection.

The court found that Pixelpartner's use of 'Billedbutikken' as a keyword in the AdWords system led to internet users seeing Pixelpartner's advertisement when they were looking for Billedbutikken's website. Such use was considered to take undue advantage of the trade mark BILLEDBUTIKKEN and to constitute trade mark infringement. Further,Pixelpartner acted contrary to the Marketing Practices Act. Billedbutikken was thus awarded damages and compensation.

The fact that the word 'Billedbutikken' was used as a heading for Pixelpartner's advertisement seems to have been decisive in this case.  Also, since, the search term 'Billedbutikken' stayed in the browser when Pixelpartner's advertisement was displayed, internet users might be confused as to the origin of Pixelpartner's services or believe that there was a connection between the parties. 

Source: article by Lisbet Andersen (Bech-Bruun, Copenhagen), " Use of trademark as AdWords keyword held to constitute infringement", posted online on World Trademark Review.

Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 10.14
Tags: Denmark, adword, keyword, infringement,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA2141
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment

MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.

The Class 46 Archive








+44 (0)116 2747355
+44 (0)116 2747365

Unit Q, Troon Way Business Centre
Humberstone Lane, Leicester


Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
Robert Harrison

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox