Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
FRIDAY, 5 NOVEMBER 2010
The Spanish CTM Tribunal on how to prove reputation: "Your pile of advertisement inserts and press releases does not look that impressive".

In the Judgment no. 427 ( appeal case 260/2009), the Spanish CTM Tribunal had the chance of interpreting article 9.1 c) of the CTM Regulation. As most of our reads surely know by heart (or nearly so), such article reads as follows:

"A Community trade mark shall confer on the proprietor exclusive rights therein. The proprietor shall be entitled to prevent all third parties not having his consent from using in the course of trade:

(…)

any sign which is identical with, or similar to, the Community trade mark in relation to goods or services which are not similar to those for which the Community trade mark is registered, where the latter has a reputation in the Community and where use of that sign without due cause takes unfair advantage of, or is detrimental to, the distinctive character or the repute of the Community trade mark".

In the commented case, the reputation of the claimant's CTM upon which the infringement case was construed was vigorously contested by the respondent.

Following the doctrine of the ECJ in Lloyd vs. Klijsen case (C-342/97), the Spanish CTM Tribunal concluded that claimant failed to prove "reputation" as it only produced "advertisement inserts in magazines" and "press releases" related to the litigious CTM. 

Below: Beware you CTM holder. Even this might not suffice to prove repute ...

Those "advertisement inserts in magazines" and "press releases" seemed not to impress the Tribunal when acknowledging repute. Instead, the Tribunal stated that reputation under art. 9.1 c) of the CTM Regulation could have been evidenced through statements from chambers of commerce and industry or other trade and professional associations, demoscopic studies, market analysis or expertises.

Posted by: Ignacio Marques @ 09.21
Tags: Spain, CTM infringement, reputation.,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA2089
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
POST ADDRESS

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox