Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
MONDAY, 21 JUNE 2010
Spain - the Supreme Court rules on marks consisting of colours "per se".

In the cassational appeal no.1512/2008, the Supreme Court (Contentious-administrative Chamber) took the chance of reminding how hard is to have a mark granted for a colour "as such".

The appellant, holder of the International mark application 803.195 in classes 6, 7, 8, 9 and 20, aimed the registration in Spain of a mark consisting of the red colour tipified as "pantone c32". Both the Spanish Trade marks and Patents Office and the High Court of Justice of Madrid (first judicial instance in the case) ruled that that specific colour "as such" did not have distinctive nature, and that appellant's use of the said colour as its "corporate colour" was not enough for the specific red colour to have acquired distinctiveness.

On the basis of Spanish precedents (Supreme Court ruling of March 27, 2006, cassational appeal 819/2003) and in the Court of Justice's cases "Libertel" (case C-104/01) and "KWS Saat AG" (case C-447/02), the Supreme Court has confirmed that colours as such do not "normally" have distinctive nature but in those exceptional cases where, due to an extensive and continuous use prior to the application, such colour has acquired secondary meaning. "Specially when the relevant market is very specific", has added the Supreme Court.

After having reviewed the evidence in the file, the Court stated that the red colour claimed in the application was "usual" in the market, so for public interest reasons it should remain available for all economic operators.

According to the Court, appellant did provide evidence of a prior use in Spain, but such a use was not enough to establish secondary meaning because in all cases the colour was associated with the appellant's own trade name.

Posted by: Ignacio Marques @ 13.50
Tags: Spain, colour marks.,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA1878
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
+44 (0)116 2747365
POST ADDRESS

Unit Q, Troon Way Business Centre
Humberstone Lane, Leicester
LE4 9HA

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox