Log in


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
Spain – the CTM Court cancels the Spanish trade mark for “TUPPERSEX”.

In a recent Judgment, the CTM Court of Spain (seated – guess where- in Alicante) has partially awarded a trade mark infringement action based in the CTM no. 334,599 and 1,438,670 "TUPPERWARE" and has cancelled the respondent's Spanish registrations for “TUPPERSEX” (and device) in class 35. The cancelled trademark (well, one of them) consists in the following device (with excuses):

No wonder that the respondent is an undertaking dedicated to the doorstep selling of erotic paraphernalia.

After dismissing the defences raised by the respondent on (i) the lack of use of the claimant’s rights (who succeeded in demonstrating that has 6,000 contractors in Spain that organised 90,000 sale meetings for the sale of "TUPPERWARE" branded products) and (ii) the vulgarisation of the term “TUPPERWARE” (the Court found that there was no “inactivity or passivity” on the claimant’s side when enforcing its trade mark rights), the Court found that the junior trade mark “TUPPERSEX” (and its derivatives) did enter in conflict with the “TUPPERWARE” priorities. The main trigger of such decision was the identity of the first syllable in the conflicting trade marks (which according to the Court becomes the most critical factor), plus the identity in the services covered by the said marks (class 35).

However, the Court did not grant damages in favour of the claimant. The Court found that there was not any evidence in the record that demonstrated that the respondent had acted in bad faith when applying for the cancelled trade marks. This has become a sine qua non requirement in Spain for trade mark infringement actions where respondent is covered by trade mark registrations.

Full text of this Judgment (that tackles quite a few other issues) can be read here (in Spanish).

Posted by: Ignacio Marques @ 18.16
Tags: Spain, cancellation action, damages.,
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA1436
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment

MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.

The Class 46 Archive








+44 (0)116 2747355
+44 (0)116 2747365

Unit Q, Troon Way Business Centre
Humberstone Lane, Leicester


Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
Robert Harrison

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox