Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
SATURDAY, 15 DECEMBER 2007
Transfer of "marlenedietrich.com"

The WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center recently decided that the domain marlenedietrich.com had to be transferred to the Marlene Dietrich Collection GmbH, the proprietor of a German trade mark registration for the word mark "Marlene Dietrich".

The domain name did not appear to have ever been in use, and the complainant only filed "incomplete evidence" of previous correspondence with the respondent discussing a possible transfer of the domain. The respondent did not reply to the complainant’s contentions during the proceedings.

Nonetheless, the panel decided that "the respondent had registered the Domain Name with the intention of exploiting (...) the goodwill associated with the Complainant’s widely known trademark, a trademark in which the respondent has no rights or legitimate interests." The panel further ruled that the Domain Name had been registered in bad faith within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy ("the Policy") and as such had to be transferred to the complainant. On the point of "bad faith" the panel found that paragraph 4(b) of the Policy contained of a non exhaustive list and that (...)


"(a) the name of Marlene Dietrich is world famous,

(b) it is highly probable that the respondent, when he registered the Domain Name, appreciated that it was a registered trademark — a very high proportion of such names are registered as trademarks,

(c) accordingly, he will have appreciated from the outset that the domain name will have had a substantial commercial value and

(d) he will be likely to have known that anyone (other than the complainant or a licensee of the complainant) making commercial use of the Domain Name would be likely to be infringing the complainant’s rights."


  • More information about Marlene Dietrich can be found here and here.
  • The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy can be found here.

Posted by: Birgit Clark @ 12.55
Tags: Domain names, German trade marks, WIPO, WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA1348
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
POST ADDRESS

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox