Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
MONDAY, 20 JULY 2009
Frankfurt court enforces "impressum" measures against ISPs

Class 46 is indebted to Andreas Lubberger (Lubberger Lehment, Berlin) for providing information concerning an action brought by Coty Prestige Lancaster Group GmbH against kijiji.de internet sale site owners Marktplaats BV and Kijiji GmbH before the Frankfurt District Court. This decision addresses the liability of internet service providers in respect of both "precautionary" and "follow up" measures which ISPs might possibly have to observe for compliance with so-called "impressum" obligations (Andreas explains: the "impressum" is a short term which is used in Germany to indicate the set of information which is to be provided by every commercial offerer of goods for sale on the internet under Article 6 of the E-Commerce Directive). The first part of Article 6 of that Directive states, in relevant part:

"Information to be provided

In addition to other information requirements established by Community law, Member States shall ensure that commercial communications which are part of, or constitute, an information society service comply at least with the following conditions:

... (b) the natural or legal person on whose behalf the commercial communication is made shall be clearly identifiable; ".
Adds Andreas,
"We consider the illegal "pseudonymity" of professional dealers a major incentive for trade mark infringers to chose eBay as their preferred sales channel and thus aim to enforce this obligation on behalf of Coty and others".
You can read the full text of this decision here. Class 46 understands that (i) Kijiji has filed a writ for an appeal but has not yet substantiated its reasons and that (ii) the Court of Appeal in Frankfurt (the Higher Regional Court) has already indicated in an previous case that it shares the approach of the District Court, which suggests that it is highly unlikely that the appeal will succeed.

Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 10.45
Tags: duty to provide details of sellers, Germany, online sales,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA1225
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
POST ADDRESS

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox