Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schr÷ter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
THURSDAY, 23 APRIL 2009
Spain – Olympics and Trade Mark Law.

Do not play with the term “Olimpic” (“Olympic” in English), that according to a recent judgment of the Spanish Supreme Court dated February 24, 2009 must be reserved for activities related to the Olympic Games.


A Spanish individual tried to register the Spanish trade mark no. 2269636 “Antic Olimpic” (and device) for services in class 42 ("restaurants"). The trade mark consisted in the logo below.



The Spanish Patents and Trade Marks Office (SPTO) refused its registration, and the applicant brought an appeal before the High Court of Madrid. The appeal was upheld, and the Court ruled that the brand was registrable.

The Spanish Olympic Committee (official Spanish authority in the field – opposing party in the judicial proceedings) appealed such Judgment. The story ends with the Supreme Court awarding the appeal from the Spanish Olympic Committee and overturning the decision of the lower Court.

According to the reported Judgment, the lower Court failed in applying section 49 of so-called Spanish Sport Act ("Ley 10/1990, de 15 de octubre, de Deportes)". According to this specific section, the words “Olympic Games” ("Juegos OlÝmpicos") and “Olympics” (“Olimpiadas”) and related signs cannot be used by third parties alien to the Spanish Olympic Committee. According to the Judgment, applying for the registration of any of those signs amounts to its “use” – and therefore falls under the scope of the prohibition in section 49 of the Spanish Sport Act.

The Spanish Supreme Court found that the prohibition envisaged in section 49 of the Sport Act is to be considered “ordre public”, so the SPTO is bound to it when applying the absolute grounds for trade mark refusal and is obliged to refuse any trade mark intending to gain exclusive rights over any of the Olympic family of brands.

Posted by: Ignacio Marques @ 18.49
Tags: absolute grounds for refusal, Olympics, Spain,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA1049
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
+44 (0)116 2747365
POST ADDRESS

Unit Q, Troon Way Business Centre
Humberstone Lane, Leicester
LE4 9HA

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox